What is a peer reviewed article? The full answer to this question requires an acquaintance with the basic principles and values of academic validation process. The performed work should meet the standards that are accepted in the academic circles. A peer review is an anonymous analysis and estimation of the original scientific, popular scientific or artistic work of other experts in a concrete field of science. The selection of these valuation rules is far from accidental and must be maintained in accordance with the specific requirements for each work. Let us look closer at these principles:
- 1) Relevance and correctness of the chosen theme. It is a particularly important issue for social studies papers format research, in which data are updating daily. Any research that has lost its relevance is absolutely useless. This rule, like a public filter, protects ordinary users from an excess of papers with zero value.
- 2) A good and detailed overview of the literature. When you are doing even the simplest assignment writing for any type of a review, you have to study all the important sources, which have a connection with your assignment. Avoiding this significant rule, an author puts oneself in the position of Robinson on the desert island. It is practically impossible to find the field of research with a zero number of previous research papers. Even modern and fast developing branches of science like cognitive science can provide a considerable amount of solid reliable works. The cognitive science papers format requires a solid number of references to demonstrate one's familiarity with the material under study.
- 3) Originality of the accomplished work. It is the direct consequence of the previous rule. An attentive author has to compare the received conclusions with the analogues in this area of study. Sometimes, an author can be absolutely sure in the identity of the theses without knowing the results obtained by the previous reviewers. This rule protects the author's interests and makes sure that any sticky situation will be avoided.
- 4) Validation of the quality of the performed design work. Every type of review focuses on a specific audience. Any kind of inaccuracies in the presentation of the material may scare the readers off. For example, the twilight book review must be in strict accordance with the readers' taste. The possibility of losing the attention of a potential audience is an inexcusable luxury on the competitive market.