Posted at 11.25.2018
In philosophy, the nice life is the sort of life that an individual may dream of living. Inside the ancient times, the facet of the good life was simple because it only entailed having enough food on the table, using a tribal affiliation, having a family, and shelter. It had been basically the liberty one would acquire from the hardships in life (Colson and Harold p23). Socrates was one of the major philosophers that came up with the definition of the good life. Aside from Socrates, other influential philosophers of old times as well created their own quarrels on the issue of the nice life. In their arguments regarding the good life and how to achieve it, a few of the philosophers tend to have similar sentiments on the aspect while some differ in their sentiments. The below essay seeks to handle the philosophical aspect of the nice life and how individuals in the world can achieve the good life.
In philosophy, there were lots of arguments based on the nice life and methods to achieve the nice life. Among the philosophers that added to the discussion of the good life and how to attain it is Aristotle. Within the Nichomachean ethics, it is established that the philosopher Aristotle developed the good life theory for humans. Matching to his theory of the nice life. Aristotle highlights that the good life is any particular one which flourishes and that individuals live well (Hallman, p45). He argues that the nice life is a happy life, with one not only being amused or creating a happy feeling but rather having a fulfilled life. The philosopher equates the good life to a very important thing that will function well hence achieving the expectation of the main one who uses that thing. The philosopher thinks that the good life entails the life span of moral virtue, hence for one to live such a life, she or he must portray a certain skills or intelligence about the moral matters in life. He argues that the life of honest virtue will stand in the way of the nice life and that of delight (Vanier, p64).
As stated in the earlier paragraph, according to Aristotle the nice life could be considered as a function of people in the modern culture fulfilling their individual functions with quality. In pursuit of the excellence needed for the good life, there are three main kinds of individual virtue that the philosopher identified. The three kinds of real human virtue are as well known as pathways of quality. The three human being virtues include personal, intellectual, and interpersonal superiority (Hallman, p35).
According to the philosopher, the personal excellence in the nice life falls under the moral virtue. The idea of persona development is involved in the moral virtue. The intellectual brilliance on the other side comes under the intellectual virtue. According to Aristotle, intellectual virtue can be compared to intelligence because is the excellence in thought. This specific virtue is necessary as it pertains to reasoning and making decisions in life. Reasoning and making the decision in ones life is essential in achieving the nice life (Colson and Harold, p46). The third kind of superiority is the social excellence, which comes under the virtuous companionship virtue. Under this particular virtue, Aristotle highlights that individuals should figure out how to interact with other folks in the population so that they can achieve the good life. The conversation with other people in the population creates the togetherness in the world hence enhancing contentment in such a world. The philosopher argues out that delight is the main element to the nice life (Vanier, p75).
In his quarrels on what the good life is Aristotle bases his sentiments on the favorite conceptions of the nice life in the contemporary society. Among the conceptions is pleasure. Many people in the society have the assumption that the good life is focused on pleasure. Though Aristotle argues that the nice life is pleasurable, those who seek pleasures in life do not lead the nice life. It is because they have a tendency to seek pleasure in the wrong ways and places. In their search of pleasure, they finish up being sidetracked from living the good life. Another conception of the good life is virtue. Matching to Aristotle, virtue is regarded as a vital element of the good life. Though it is essential to the good life, Aristotle highlights that being virtuous does not identify with the nice life because it may entail coping with great hurting (Hallman, p72).
According to Aristotle, the good life may be accomplished by happiness. It is because the good life is dependent on the internal factors in the life of an individual. He points out that suppose the good life could be dependent on the external factors in life, then it could not be self-sufficient. He argues that joy is known as to be self-sufficient. Enjoyment is something that cannot be improved with the addition of anything further to it because the life of somebody who is happy is a total life. In his quarrels, happiness can be achieved imagine a person carries out activities that would bring them enjoyment. The activities may be physical or conscious. Relating to Aristotle, for you to achieve pleasure in his / her life, they must take part in proper activities that lead to the nice life. Proper things in life have to be enjoyed for a person to obtain contentment for the nice life. He argues that the correct activities that may lead to happiness tend to represent the purpose of the human being kind in the modern culture. The purpose of the human kind in the society in that particular quality tends to divide humans from other varieties of beings. He extended pointing out that reason is that one quality that eventually ends up separating humans from other species beings in the society. Therefore, in leading the good life, Aristotle concludes that those activities that help humans share their reasoning talents are essential in allowing individuals to live the good life in the world (Vanier, p89).
In addition compared to that, the philosopher as well put across that the nice life could be achieved if one can make his / her decisions in life. This is based on the definition that the good life requires living an accomplished and flourishing life. In his arguments, Aristotle identified that in the historical times, many people could not lead the nice life because these were dying in slavery. These individuals included those in the lower social category and women since their experts decided most things in their lives. These were not given any chance of making their own decisions in activities that oppressed them in life. This indicates that these individuals weren't happy in their life hence they cannot lead the good life as Aristotle highlights (Colson and Harold, p63).
According to Aristotle, the nice life can as well be performed by having the ability to reason. This tends to differentiate the individuals kind in population from the brute pets in the modern culture. The ability to reason in life situations results in when people are wise in undertaking their day to day activities. The philosopher argues that the human perfection, which would lead to the good life, would entail the perfection of the intellect. Since the good life according to the discussion of Aristotle consists of the goal of an individual, he further stated that the purpose of man includes perfecting his sense of knowing things in the culture (Hallman, p33).
Socrates was another early philosophers that added in the debate on the good life and how it ought to be achieved. Relating the arguments made by Socrates, the nice life was the one which is not materialistic but instead about the mind of an individual. He argued that an individual with a healthy mind will live the good life as compared to that who is wealthy. This means that that he recognized wealth to be immaterial and this it generally does not lead to the good life that folks may want to live. Matching to Socrates, the good life is one which individual lives in reality (Hughes, p76).
In achieving the good life, you have to acquire contentment in life. This is a sentiment that Socrates described in the discussion of the good life. According to the ancient philosopher, contentment cannot be received by the richness of a person or by his / her material consumption. Delight can be had from a wealthy and active mind. In Socrates sentiments, circumstances that is rich is typically not healthy because such a state lacks pleasure that may lead to the nice life. His arguments based on this finish that wealthy states lack happiness and they may well not achieve the good life is the fact that these claims finish up in war almost all of the time because of the scramble for the resources it includes. People in these countries combat for the resources in order to make their ends to meet, hence such face injustices, and inequality. In his arguments, the philosopher uses the exemplory case of Athens. Athens, according to Socrates lack the happiness that is required to attain the good life since it comes with an empire that is full of troubles and is hated by many people (Hughes, p32).
According to Socrates, virtue was an important aspect towards achieving the nice life. For instance, those who possessed good virtues in a life lived the nice life as compared to those who had materialistic riches in the population. The historical philosopher argued that the best way in which people would reside in the culture was by adding much concentrate on self-development alternatively than acquiring prosperity. In his arguments, it is suggested that individuals who focus on friendship and truth in the modern culture end in creating a population that has the good life. Virtues, matching to Socrates are said to be important in the good life because they have a tendency to represent the best qualities an individual should have in life. In his arguments on the good life, Socrates stressed that virtues will be the most valuable belongings in an specifics life, hence leading to the nice life. The philosopher as well identified virtue with knowledge and explained that since the two can lead to the good life, they could be learnt. With virtues and knowledge, an individual can have the ability to examine his / her life. The philosopher pointed out that the unexamined life is not the good life and therefore it is not well worth living (Colson and Harold, p98).
In assessment to the quarrels offered by Aristotle, Socrates as well places across that in order to achieve the good life; a person must have reason in life. He argued that reason was ways to the nice life. With regards to this discussion, the philosopher explained that the real happiness of individuals in the modern culture is enhanced by taking part in activities that are right.
Apart from Socrates and Aristotle, Plato is just one more ancient philosopher who contributed his arguments on the idea of the nice life. Matching to Plato, every person in the culture has an equivalent opportunity of acquiring the nice life, hence it is not limited to few individuals in the contemporary society. Generally, Plato defines good life as a state in which an individual would be happy. He moves ahead in explaining the enjoyment is a state when a person has everything that he or she needs and little or nothing more. According to the philosopher, one has to show virtue in the good life. An individual can only show virtue suppose his or her needs in life have been satisfied. Similar to the other philosophers, he established his arguments on virtues (Colson and Harold, p48).
In his discussion regarding the good life, Plato argues that an individual in population who will live the good life is person who is actually happy in his life. For example, it has been established that Platos views on the success of the good life are somewhat similar to the views distributed by Aristotle. In his views regarding the way the good life can be achieved, Plato suggested that delight and a truly virtuous life could be useful in the pursuit to achieve the good life. The philosopher points out in his arguments that for one to lead a virtuous life, which would eventually contribute to the good life, they must achieve some virtues in life. The virtues include courage, self-discipline, justice, as well as intelligence. These sentiments predicated on achieving the nice life are as well echoed by Aristotle in his debate on the accomplishment of the good life (Hallman, p92).
In conclusion, the good life entails the inner factors in a persons life such as virtues and delight. The three main philosophers talked about in the essay concerning their quarrels on the nice life include Aristotle, Socrates, and Plato. As reviewed in the above essay, the philosophers have remarked that the good life is not about being prosperous but rather being happy and getting the moral and intellectual virtues in life. It's been founded that for a person to attain the good life, they need to acquire happiness, and this can be achieved by taking part in the correct activities that lead to happiness. In addition to acquiring contentment in life, the good life can be achieved by one understanding how to make their own decisions in life and having the ability to reason.