Audi AG vs Bob D'Amato 6th Circuit Case

com to market and merchandised his goods. Moreover, Audi also claimed that Amato's websites frauds and dilutes famous trademarks used by Audi, the "Four Ring Audi Logo" and "Quattro" in addition to the distinctive trade outfit to Audi automobiles. The district court also surrendered Audi attorneys' charges, anyway declined to allow Audi statutory damages under 15 U. S. C. The court associated the utilization of exclusively contract laws conclusions concerning significant distortion. Besides, the court mentioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office controls when making the judgment. Application Audi signed a licensing contract with Volkswagen that would see the plaintiffs acquire exclusive rights to sell various patented technology products abroad. The licensees would later learn that they could not register patents in other jurisdictions.

They filed a suit against Bob D'Amato for breaching the contract and prayed for compensation. audisport. com, at which the two items, for instance, tops and shirts bearing the "Audi Sport" logo, and advancing space, were offered access to be accessed (Fryer 28). The Sixth Circuit as necessities be affirmed the District Court's decision, which forever asked respondent from making continued infringing usage of Audi's trademarks, facilitated D'Amato to trade the audisport. com region to affronted parties, and allowed insulted parties Audi AG ("Audi") and Volkswagen of America Inc. ("Volkswagen") legal advisors' charges as the necessary party (Lampke 267). " ABA Sec. Intell. Prop. L. Ann. "Why the Fair Use Defense of Free-Speech or Parody under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Needs Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.