Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Date Effects of 9/11 Attack Introduction Background The 9/11 attacks included a coordinated series of attacks which were carried out by a particular Islamic group known as the Al-Qaeda. These attacks led to the killing of about 2 996 individuals and injured approximately 6 000 other people (History.com Staff 2011). Property of significant costs was also damaged. Since the World Trade Center (WTC) was destroyed there was extensive damage to the economy on the global markets. Following these attacks there have been a lot of discussions and debate on whether or not there were people in some circles who knew about the impending attacks (Bankers 2013). Various conspiracy theories and studies were then carried out to determine whether or not some people knew about these attacks. Statement of Problem There are many unanswered questions regarding the events of the 9/11. The paper will therefore seek History.com Staff. (2011 February 22). 9/11 Commission. Retrieved January 04 2017 from history.com Keiger P. (2011 September 9). 9 Six Tech Advances to Prevent Future Attacks. Retrieved January 04 2017 from news.nationalgeographic.com Maxwell J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach. Sage. Ray J. (n.d.). Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7 Building 7. Retrieved January 04 2017 from www.debunking911.com THE TOP 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story. (2006 May 6). Retrieved January 04 2017 from www.911truth.org Unger C. (2004). House of Bush house of Saud: the secret relationship between the world's two most powerful dynasties. New York: Scribner. Various Sources. Misinformation. (2011 September 8). Retrieved January 04 2017 from www.911research.wtc7.net W T C 7. (2011 September 11). Retrieved January 04 2017 from www.wtc7.net Watt D. (2007). On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report 12(1) 82-101. [...]
A formal thesis proposal shall be prepared in accordance with the standards of the academic discipline. The formal proposal must provide a clear and lucid description of a question or problem and a proposed method of answering the question or solving the problem. Capstone thesis faculty must approve the proposal before students move on to the next stage of the process. The proposal should explain the question or problem to be investigated and convince the thesis professor that the question or problem merits investigation. It should show that the student has read the relevant and recent literature on the subject and it should contain a list of academically appropriate resources consulted during the preliminary stages of research. In general, the thesis proposal should include background information related to the research topic, purpose of the research, methodology, and analytic procedures to be used. Proposal drafting is considered a learning process and helps students avoid oversights and possible mistakes. The formal proposal should not exceed five (5) pages (proposal title page not included). For further guidance on [what the thesis should contain], see Appendix 1 (reprinted below from the End of Program Assessment Manual). HLSS699 Research Proposal - Specific Instructions For the thesis proposal, include each element in an abbreviated format not to exceed five pages. I. Introduction (1 page, answering all points briefly). II. Literature Review (2 pages, including at least six peer-reviewed sources that address the conceptual elements of the thesis, demonstrating that there is a “research gap”). III.Theoretical Framework (1 page, including a representative author/work that illustrates your framework). Return to IRLS500 Theory notes for a reminder of the IR theories. IV. Research Design (2 pages ). Appendix 1 MA Theses (adapted from the End of Program Assessment Manual 2012) MA Theses are expected to contain the following elements: Introduction. Identifies your specific research question and sets the general context for the study. · Statement of the problem or general research question and context leading to a clear statement of the specific research question. · Background and contextual material justifying why we should study this case or topic. · Purpose statement. Literature Review. Reviews the literature on a specific research question. The literature review focuses on discussing how other researchers have addressed the same of similar research questions. It introduces the study and places in larger context that includes a discussion of why it is important to study this case). It provides current state of our accumulated knowledge as it relates to your specific research question. · Summarize the general state of the literature (cumulative knowledge base) on the specific research question. o E.g. Study 1—summarize to include researcher’s findings, how those findings were obtained, and evaluation of biases in the findings. o Study 2— summarize to include researcher’s findings, how those findings were obtained, and evaluation of biases in the findings. o Etc., etc…….(include a minimum of at least3 of the most important studies · Short conclusion and transition to Theoretical Framework section. Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework section develops the theories or models to be used in the study and shows how you have developed testable research hypotheses. · Introduction discussing gaps in the literature, how this study will help fill some of those gaps, and justification for theory or model to be used in study. · Summary of the theory or model to be used in the study, including a diagram of the model if appropriate. · Statement of hypotheses to be tested. Research Design. Describes how you will test the hypothesis and carry out your analysis. It describes the data you will use to test your hypothesis, how you will operationalize and collect data on your variables, and the analytic methods that you will use, noting potential biases and limitations to your research approach. It should include: · Identification and operationalization (measurement) of variables. · Sampling plan (i.e., study population and sampling procedures, if appropriate). · Justification of case studies used. · Data Collection/Sources (secondary literature, archives, interviews, surveys, etc.). · Summary of analysis procedures (pattern-matching, etc.). · Limitations of study and bias discussion. Reference List. Reference the works that you have cited (direct quotes or paraphrases) in the text. This must be in APA format.