United States vs. Park Name: Course: Lecturer: City State: Date of submission: Park should have being charged despite him not directly running the company. Park being the president of the company made supervisory visits to the company; as a result he was partly aware of the to dispose of the waste In conclusion; it is conceivable that Park is entirely responsible for the contamination of the food in the stores despite his appeal to the Supreme Court. ReferenceMason A. T. & Stephenson G. (2015). American constitutional law: introductory essays and selected cases. Routledge. [...]
It is a short essay. I do need APA style and one citation. I need this by Thursday.