Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Research Report for Political Science Research Methods Course (Example)

Document Preview:

How Personal Finances Affects Democracy in Canada Name Institution Introduction A legitimate democratic authority always exercises the act of choosing its leaders and representatives to the government through open, free and fair elections. With a lot of importance accorded to the exercise and occasion throughout the world, the practice of having a legitimate democratic behaviour through voting has long been researched by many scientists being interested to find out what really drives out the perception and participation of individuals into this exercise. The act of voting is one of the only ways that citizens are likely to engage directly with the process of voting and practice CITATION Cam l Anderson amp Stephenson, . The democratic space in Canada is currently being affected by the fact that peoples personal finances are getting worse than before. Social democracy in the country is highly being eroded in the st century through one of [...]

Order Description:

RESEARCH REPORT NOTE: You must use SPSS to set up your data for analysis and to generate the tables used in your report. All of the information you need to complete the SPSS portions of this assignment are covered in the tutorial videos and assignments. PLEASE ALSO SEE ATTACHED FILES FOR SAMPLE OF A COPY COMPLETED PREVIOUSLY, PLUS THE GRADING FRAMEWORK. DETAILS ARE HERE: This assignment is based upon on the 2011 Canadian Election Study. A copy of the full dataset as well as the survey questionnaires is available on D2L. More information about the study is available at http://www.ces-eec.org/pagesE/home.html. You are required to test a hypothesis and to examine the effects of THREE plausible control variables using the statistical methods that you have learned in class. NO knowledge of the voting literature is presupposed. Simply examine the list of variables in the questionnaires on D2L and choose a relationship that interests you. The dependent variable does not have to be vote. Your report should provide a rationale for your hypothesis and choice of control variables i.e. explain whether you considered each variable to be a possible intervening variable, conditional variable, or source of spuriousness variable – and why. Your report should also present and interpret your results. The relevant tables must be included in the text. Remember to include titles and numbers for your tables. You may paste tables from your computer printout, but it may also be beneficial to type them out in a program such as Excel. Your report should be approximately 10 – 12 pages in length and MUST be typed double-spaced. You are expected to retain a copy of your report. Late submissions will be assessed a penalty a letter gradation per day, including weekend days. HINTS: Do not try to be too ambitious. A simple hypothesis often turns out to have interesting implications. A simple hypothesis is also more likely to produce a large enough association between the IV and DV to warrant testing further. Think through clearly the plausible effects of your control variables before analyzing your data. Besides being the legitimate way to proceed, you will find that this simplifies the task of making sense of your results. Remember to read the tables and not just rely on the measures of association and tests of significance. Once the association between the IV and DV is established, your priority should be to test for a plausible source of spuriousness (if any). If your relationship does turn out to be spurious, write up your results to that point, but then reformulate your hypothesis using the source of spuriousness as your new independent variable. Then test for the effects of two plausible control variables. You will not be judged on the quality of your findings per se (i.e. do not waste time testing several hypotheses in the hope of coming up with one that turns out to be strongly supported). What counts is the ability to use statistical tests appropriately and to interpret the resulting tables and statistics properly. You will also be assessed on the quality of your causal thinking. Please see the Grading Framework for more information

Subject Area: Politics

Document Type: Proofreading

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $110

Words 2750

Pages 10

Completed in 42 days

Expert Kenny K

Client Review

Highly recommended because writer delivers on time, writes high-quality content, and will listen to all of your instructions and concerns through the complete process.

Positive
12.06.2015

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Proofreading

Report 4

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Proofreading

Policy Brief #1

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Proofreading

Government Meeting Report

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Proofreading

Washington Week Report

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5