Are there any good arguments that remain to show the existence of God

Sextus believed that the existence or non-existence of things differ when one is awake or asleep. This means that the beliefs of an awake person cannot be similar to those of a sleeping person. He goes ahead and explains that a person needs enough proof to explain the existence of some things (Karl & Desmond n. p). Legitimate proof to explain the existence of God would help people belief if truly He existed at a certain time. p). For instance, he uses the example of Zeus having sex with immortal women, a practice the dogmatic find unbelievable and impossible. This means that arguments against the existence of God cannot be used to proof his inexistence. What, then, should you conclude? In conclusion, the existence or inexistence of God depends on what an individual beliefs in.