Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

God cannot be thought of as nonexistent (Example)

Document Preview:

Student Tutor Course Date God Cannot Be Thought Of As Nonexistent The most discussed philosophical argument and one that has mystified nearly every philosopher ever since the enlightenment era is the existence of God. Various arguments have been put forth and evaluated although they have not sufficiently proven God's existence. The ontological argument is one of such philosophical arguments initially proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury from 1033 to 1109 which uses ontology to explain the existence of God. Anselm defined God as the most exceptional conceivable being in chapter two of his famous book titled Proslogion. The theory is a priori kind of argument that attempts to prove God's existence by applying logic and reasoning. Further the effort to provide evidence on the existence of God became practical from the time when the human being was born. But to adequately prove the existence of God a lot of description of the most magnificent believable being leads to the validity of the argument. The objection to the ontological argument raised by Gaunilo proved that anyone could tamper with Anselm's argument and provide evidence to the existence of whichever concept only by using the precision that the idea is the greatest compared to all other thoughts that can be conceived. Nonetheless the disapproval was insufficient on the ground that the perception of a perfect island is faulty when formulated with Anselm's argument. As a result the ontological argument by Anselm is credible regardless of Gaunilo's criticism and also sufficient to explain God existence. Works Cited Anselm Saint. Anselm of Canterbury: The major works. Oxford University Press (2008): 82-104. Andrew Chapman. “The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God” 1000WordPhilosophy 30 June 2014 1000wordphilosophy.com 21 March 2018 Ward Thomas M. "Losing the lost island." International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83.1 (2018): 127-134. [...]

Order Description:

TOPIC: Philosophical Theory: Writing Test (do ALL of the below in your paper) Pick any philosophical theory from the textbook. Be sure to name the particular author for that theory. (It's best to stick to chapters 1 and 2, but you may go beyond if you wish). Explain what the consequences surrounding your selected theory. (Why should anyone care about your topic? Why do you care?) For whatever theory you pick, also pick a competing and opposing theory and explain that theory too. Argue for the theory you feel best addresses the situation and explain why. Explain where the other theory falls short. DEADLINE: March 31st 2018 by midnight. * WORD COUNT - Minimum 900 words, Maximum 1400 words (Penalty for going under are more severe than going over). Following formatting rules below this should be 3.3 to 4 pages. Quotes word count total should be about 200-250 words. * Normal Font, size 12, double spaced, MLA citations, NO TITLE PAGE, one inch margins, numbered pages, word count (do two of these, labeling one with quotes and one without quotes) * 3 academic sources, 1 of which must be your textbook. (Use proper works cited page format) * 3 quotes, 1 of which must be from your textbook. (Use proper in-text citations) I expect this paper to look like a real academic paper, and that means proper margins, grammar, spelling. Separating your work into coherent paragraphs. Having an intro and conclusion. Strength of sources will be a factor in your grade. Make sure your sources are reputable and relevant. So medical academic journal articles are better than tabloid newspaper articles, etc. Do not cite Wikipedia as your source, instead check wikipedia’s sources and perhaps use those. You will be graded on three metrics: STYLE, UNDERSTANDING, and ARGUMENT. Style accounts for 50% of your paper grade, Understanding 30%, and Argument 20%. Style means grammar, spelling, the look of the paper, did you follow all the guidelines? Did you answer all the questions and provide all the information the prompt asks for? Understanding means did you really understand the theory you discussed? Did you get it right? Did you explain it with enough detail? How strong and trustworthy are your sources? Argument means was your analysis of the theory or situation evenhanded, comprehensive, and fair? Did you make a good argument? You will need to do more than just say “I feel, for me, in my personal opinion”, instead make an argument in such a way that all rational people should be obliged to accept it. A good proven path is to either argue for superior outcomes or for some duty-bound principle that tends to work generally. Proper in text Citation: owl.english.purdue.edu Proper work cited page: owl.english.purdue.edu Proper Citation of Electronic Sources: owl.english.purdue.edu Easy Automatic Source Creator: http://www.easybib.com/

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Reports

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $40

Words 1100

Pages 4

Completed in 10 days

Expert AllanJeff

Client Review

Great Writer, 0 plagiarism, and will get the job done on time

Positive
03.27.2018

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Assessing moral values

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

The Self

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Hobbes & Locke

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Casestudy Essay

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Love and Other Drugs

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5