Document Preview:
Student’s Name Instructor’s Name Course Date Sociology Case Study – YMCA 1) Public goods are non-rivalrous and non-excludable. Thus using them does not reduce the amount available to others and it is also not possible to exclude others from using them. Common goods are non-excludable but may be rivalrous also runs fitness-related programs as part of its strategy to appeal to potential members and remain relevant (Worth 468). Works Cited Slavov Sita Nataraj. "Public Versus Private Provision Of Public Goods". Journal Of Public Economic Theory vol 16 no. 2 2013 pp. 222-258. Wiley-Blackwell doi:10.1111/jpet.12058. Worth Michael J. Nonprofit Management. SAGE 2014. [...]
Order Description:
Case Questions 1) Is access to a health club a public good, or a common good? How about access to programs that provide education about health and fitness? 2) Should a nonprofit that competes with a for-profit business be taxed just to level the playing field, even if its earned income is related to its mission? 3) As discussed in Chapter 1 of Nonprofit Management 4th edition by Michael J. Worth, this text, Robert Herman(2010) observe that nonprofit management uniquely requires the ability to integrate mission, the acquisition of resources, and strategy. How are those points reflected in the case of the Y? I did attached a copy of that might help for the questions.
Subject Area: Social Work
Document Type: Personal Statement
