Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Case study (Example)

Document Preview:

Criminology Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Criminology With the information provided one wonders whether the suspect of the crime has been apprehended and is behind bars or if he still at large. Whether a case in point is a recent event or not is something to be desired. Be that as it may the police officers ought to go for the suspect and while they prepare to present them in court that is while still doing investigations gather evidence that could be admissible in a court of law. Since this officers were in the right course of action collecting the pants that were soaked with the probable victim’s blood as this will serve as part of the evidence to back their case. Their knock and talk operation at least bore some fruits even though the case study does not show if he was indeed apprehended. References Bradley C. M. (2009). Knock and Talk and the Fourth Amendment. Ind. LJ  84 1099. Bush Tom. "A Privacy-Based Analysis For Warrant-Less Aerial Surveillance Cases." California Law Review. N.p. 2018. Web. 23 Feb. 2018. [...]

Order Description:

Unit III Case Study Case Study Scenario: Two homicide detectives employed by the local city police department want to conduct a “knock and talk” at a murder suspect’s home. There is a grassy road leading to the suspect’s home, but it is faster for the detectives to travel by boat. They use the department’s marine patrol vessel, arrive at the suspect’s home, and dock their boat. They walk up the dock to the path leading to the suspect’s home. As they approach the front door, they notice a trash pile in the back yard. On top of the trash pile is a pair of pants with red-colored stains on them. The officers seize the pants, which turn out to be stained with the victim’s blood. The pants are critical evidence. The defendant’s attorney moves to suppress the pants. What is the state’s best argument for the validity of the seizure to include the pants as admissible evidence? Ensure you cover the following issues in your arguments:  curtilage,  exigent circumstances,  knock and announce/knock and talk,  plain view, and  public space. Cite relevant case law when appropriate. Your paper should be at least two pages in length, follow APA guidelines, and include a title and reference page. The title and reference page do not count towards the minimum page length. Use at least one article from the CSU Online Library (the ProQuest Criminal Justice database is a good place to start your research). Properly cite the textbook and any other scholarly references utilized to support your position. Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below

Subject Area: Criminology

Document Type: Dissertation

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $20

Words 550

Pages 2

Completed in 2 days

Expert Huddah

Client Review

I would give her 6 stars if i could!!!


Similar projects

Subject of the project is Criminology   Type of the project is Dissertation

Crime Case Study

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
  • Our SiteJabber rating is: