Name Professor Course Date Redefining Search & Seizure in the Modern Era Introduction Apparently the fourth amendment of the United States constitution remains as the most occupied and petitioned portion of the social code. The fourth piece of legislation reads the privilege regarding the general population to stay secure in their people houses papers and impacts against irrational inquiries and seizures will not be disregarded and no permits should issue. However upon reasonable justification upheld by Oath or assertion alongside especially depicting the place for inquiry as well as the people or items for seizure (Liechty 171). Essentially the most evident social price related to the utilization of new technology in law pursuance remains the deprivation of individual protection that comes about because of the expanded capacity involving police offices keeping an eye on personal conduct. Whereas the issue has existed as far back as science initially upgraded a of technology along with the aggressiveness by law enforcement bodies dictate development of new approaches to facilitate the address of governmental interpretations especially the judicature. Apparently the adoption of stringent measures and norms involving surveillance practices would uphold the dignity of the fourth amendment by protecting the society out of intrusiveness from unwarranted surveillance practices. The assumption of the intrusion paradigm would serve in minimizing arbitrary behaviour and intrusions in the public and guarantee full coverage of the fourth amendment by protecting the privacy of people from irrational searches and seizures by the law enforcement agencies using sophisticated surveillance devices. Works Cited Devins Neal and Louis Fisher. The democratic constitution. Oxford university press 2015. Liechty Daniel. "The Fourth Amendment in Flux: The Roberts Court Crime Control and Digital Privacy." (2017): 171. Schulhofer Stephen J. More Essential than Ever: The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty First Century. Oxford University Press 2012: 30-53. [...]
Write a persuasive essay of 1,000 to 1,200 words (not including cover page and references; do not include an abstract or executive summary) where you analyze and make recommendations for substantive and substantial changes or updates to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution which reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."