Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Argument paper (Example)

Document Preview:

Is it ever permissible to torture a person? Name Professor Institution Course Date Introduction Torture can be elaborated as the official sectioned infliction of intense suffering purposefully for forcing an individual to do or say something against their will (Langbein 2012). Under the international law it is illegal to use torture in any circumstance whatsoever. However touchier undoubtedly continues globally the moral argument prohibiting it is much common among those opposing torture. This paper aims at exploring whether it is permissible or not to torture an individual under any circumstance. To achieve this argumentative nature will form the basis of analysis where a few premises will examine torture can result to loss of lives despite the fact that it is immoral. Other strategies can be put in place to extract crucial information from the required persons especially the terrorist. This can be swiftly achieved through psychological interrogation or perhaps mental torture but not the physical torture. References Daems T. (2016). Slaves and statues: torture prevention in contemporary Europe. British Journal of Criminology azv133. Iacopino V. & Xenakis S. N. (2011). Neglect of medical evidence of torture in Guantanamo Bay: a case series. PLoS Med  8(4) e1001027. Langbein J. H. (2012). Torture and the law of proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Régime. University of Chicago Press. [...]

Order Description:

This assignment is not an essay but an exercise that helps build toward your Final Paper for the course. Your task in this assignment is to construct the best argument you can for a position on a controversial topic. Your argument should be your own creation. You may take inspiration from other arguments, but the formulation of the argument you present should be original to you. Prepare: Begin by choosing a topic from the PHI103 Final Paper Options list. Construct an argument for a position on the topic. This is the position that you will defend in your Final Paper. Make your argument as high quality as possible: In particular, make sure that all of your premises are true and that the truth of the conclusion is demonstrated by your premises. Consider possible objections to your argument, and revise it several times until you have an argument that is as strong as possible. Search in the Ashford University Library for quality academic sources that support some aspect of your argument. Constructing quality arguments is harder than it sounds; you may find that your first few attempts have problems and that it takes quite a bit of time and effort to revise an argument to a point that the premises adequately support the conclusion. You will be revising this argument for each of the remaining assignments in this course. Write: In your paper, Present a main argument in standard form with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Here is an example of what it means for an argument to be presented in standard form: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Provide support for each premise of your argument. Explain the meaning of the premise, and provide supporting evidence for the premise. [One paragraph for each premise] Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments, or other ways of demonstrating the truth of the premise (for more ideas about how to support the truth of premises take a look at the instructor guidance for this week). This section should include at least one scholarly research source. For further information about discovering and including high-quality research take a look at the [email protected] Tutorial. Explain how your conclusion follows from your premises. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week One Annotated Example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses. Let your instructor know if you have any remaining questions about how to complete this paper. Writing Help Image For guidance about how to paraphrase sources visit the Ashford Writing Center Guidelines for Paraphrasing Sources webpage. For guidance about how to quote sources visit the Ashford Writing Center Integrating Quotes Into Your Essay webpage. For guidance about summarizing visit the Ashford Writing Center Guidelines for Summarizing Sources webpage. The Initial Argument Paper Must be 400 to 600 words in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about using APA style, take a look at the APA Essay Checklist for Students. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about how to create an APA reference list, take a look at the APA References List webpage. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Reports

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $10

Words 275

Pages 1

Completed in 2 days

Expert Amalia

Client Review

Very Timely considering I was in a crunch:)

Positive
08.23.2016

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Assessing moral values

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

The Self

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Hobbes & Locke

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Casestudy Essay

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Love and Other Drugs

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Reports

Extra Credit Paper

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5