Student Name Course Name Date Security and Immigration Migration in the United Kingdom Introduction International immigration migration is one of the most contested area when it comes to security of states. In fact this issue of connecting security with immigration aspects has been in existence in international security studies since the 1980s. A duality of threats have been reported threat to the national sovereignty and also a threat to human security. The research background for this essay is to understand the security issue elevation that has been brought about in the United Kingdom because of the 2005 London bombing attacks and how it has increased security concerns in the United Kingdom. A critical analysis is conducted to understand the way this has affected immigration laws policy and border control. The methodology adopted in the research paper is a thematic literature review. The structure of the research includes two main critical that the United Kingdom take up to policy systems that are structured top down but also take feedbacks from community in a bottom up initiative. This will ensure the country governance units and anti-terrorism units are well informed to prevent further attacks. References BBC. 2015. Did Paris attacker pose as a refugee? Available at: www.bbc.co.uk [Accessed on July 23 2016] Birrell D. and Gray A.M. 2016. Social policy the devolved administrations and the UK coalition government. The Coalition Government and Social Policy: Restructuring the Welfare State p.325. Bosworth M. and Guild M. 2008. Governing Through Migration Control: Security and Citizenship in Britain. British Journal of Criminology Volume 48 No 6 pp.703-719 Cinoglu H. (2013). TERRORISM INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND BORDER CONTROL. European Scientific Journal 9(20). Lazaridis G. 2016. Security insecurity and migration in Europe. Routledge. Vertovec S. 2010. Towards post‐multiculturalism? Changing communities conditions and contexts of diversity. International social science journal 61(199) pp.83-95. [...]
Instructions. example topic quetision Aims and Objectives • Has the 2005 London bombing attack affect laws, policy and border control, how has it increased security concern in the UK? • How much has changed in laws and policies towards security threats? • How has security been maintained? • Is immigration and migration linked to terrorism? • Has the securitisation worked? some books that I looked at Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), pp.319-363. Basaran, T. (2012). Security, law and borders. London: Routledge. Baylis, J. and Smith, S. (2005). The globalization of world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BBC (2014) Powers to stop British jihadists returning to UK - PM bbc.co.uk [Accessed on 01 BBC (2015) Did Paris attacker pose as a refugee? bbc.co.uk [Accessed on 01 BBC (2015) 7 July London bombings: 15 changes to anti-terror planning bbc.co.uk [Accessed on 01 Bossong, R. and Carrapiço, H. (2016). EU borders and shifting internal security. Bosworth, M. and Guild, M. (2008). Governing Through Migration Control: Security and Citizenship in Britain. British Journal of Criminology, 48(6), pp.703-719. Grech, o and Wohlfeld, M (2014) Migration in the Mediterranean: Human rights, security and development perspectives. MEDAC: Malta, www.um.edu.mt Jackson, R. and Sørensen, G. (2016). Introduction to international relations. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Matthews, J. (2014). Media performance in the aftermath of terror: Reporting templates, political ritual and the UK press coverage of the London Bombings, 2005. Journalism, 17(2), pp.173-189. McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), pp.563-587. Parish, C (2005) The London bombings. The American Journal of Nursing, Vol.105(9), pp.102-103 . Somerville, W. (2007). Immigration under New Labour. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. Spencer, S. (2011). The migration debate. Bristol: Policy Press. Steans, J. (2010). An introduction to international relations theory. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman. Waever, O. (2011). Politics, security, theory. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5), pp.465-480. Methodology The research will be based upon secondary research, on academic sources. Introduction: A good introduction should achieve all of the following: • define the subject and indicate broadly its extent • indicate the main theme of the work • state clearly the aims of the dissertation 8 • provide background information which the reader will need (this includes defining technical terms or words which are to be used in a special sense) • indicate the structure of the main chapters • offer a broad summary of the main argument(s) (b) Main Chapters: Concentrate on writing one chapter at a time. In each chapter it may be necessary to do all or some, of the following: • undertake a literature review (NB: There are strong arguments for NOT having a separate literature review in the dissertation, which may break up the development of an argument. You should talk to your supervisor(s) about this.) • describe methodology used and why • state the `facts' (indicating sources); • analyse and evaluate these `facts'; • state any conclusions or recommendations from the analysis Towards the end of each chapter try to give a pointer towards the next section, in the form of a short ‘mini-conclusion’, thus giving continuity to the dissertation as a whole. Be wary about the excessive use of footnotes. These can be helpful if you need to include detail useful for the reader but not essential to the flow of the argument, but otherwise should be minimised. If statistical material is included ensure that it is presented in the most concise way possible. Simple numbers are often better dealt with in the text rather than a separate table. Do not confuse the reader with pages of statistics - supplementary data can be included in appendices at the end of the dissertation, but the use of these should be sparing and relevant. (c) Conclusion: This should be kept reasonably brief and as cogent as possible. It should do all or some of the following: • summarise the findings and inferences; • make recommendations/conclusions/predictions based on the above; • refer back to the theoretical/analytical framework and evaluate this in light of the findings • emphasise the significance of the subject matter; • refer briefly to any wider consideration or implications outside the limits that have been set by the dissertation but on which the study may have a bearing .