Berghuis vs. Thompkins Case Student’s Name: Institutional Affiliation: Course: Date Due: Thompkins is engaged in three hours questioning regarding the occurrence of a shooting more than a year prior. During the interrogations he remains largely silent. However at the end we see him providing a statement that can be said to incriminate him. The police officer asks him if he prayed not object to the misconduct of the prosecution and lastly the attorney’s failure of requesting limiting instructions regarding Purifoy’s evidence (Rosenzweig & Shatz 2017). References Rosenzweig W. & Shatz D. (2017). Berghuis v. Thompkins (08-1470). LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 7 November 2017 Rancour J. (2017). Berghuis v. Thompkins 560 U.S. 370 (2010). Justia Law. Retrieved 7 November 2017 . [...]
Answer the following questions with a minimum of 350 words. Do you agree or disagree with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Berghuis vs. Thompkins case)? Is the majority or the dissenting opinion more convincing? Please explain. USE IN-TEXT CITATIONS WITH AT LEAST 2 CREDIBLE ONLINE LAW SOURCES.