Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Written Assignment 3 (Example)

Document Preview:

Name: Course: Instructor: Date: Is It Ethical to Patent or Copyright Genes Embryos or Their Parts? It is a well-known fact that the ethics of legal governance are hardly binary that is there are no absolute rights or wrongs. The law often seeks to balance priorities whether economic social or even ethical. The same is with the emerging issue of patenting or copyrighting of genes embryos or even their parts. Therefore the questions that light up heated arguments and discussion emerges is it ethical to copyright or Patent genes embryos or their parts. Various philosophies and theories have come up especially from the legislation field so as to ensure ethicality and legalism in the issue (Caplan & Robert 180). One of the individuals whose have confidently given their views in light of the issue is Professor Sung. According to Sung there are cases where it is morally will be for the good of the whole community. Also modern ethics tend to support the concept of the intrinsic value of all organisms. Therefore it is true to assert that many of the modern environmental ethics all aim at promoting the good of the environment and nature in general. This is coinciding with the traditional theories that also aim for the general good of everyone. This will promote the ethicality and legalism concerning the preservation of genetic information even in the case of patenting and copyright of genes (DesJardins 17-18). Works cited Caplan Arthur L and Robert Arp. Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. 2013. Internet resource. Gerards Janneke H. Genetic Discrimination and Genetic Privacy in a Comparative Perspective. Antwerpen [u.a.: Intersentia [u.a. 2005. Print. Corrigan Richard H. Ethics: A University Guide. Gloucester: Progressive Frontiers Press. 2010. Print. DesJardins Joseph R. Environmental Ethics. Belmont Calif. Wadsworth. 2012. Print. [...]

Order Description:

According to Sung, there are some cases in which it is morally legitimate to patent/copyright genes, embryos, or their parts. What are those cases and what is the argument for including them? According to Koepsell, there are both deontological and utilitarian reasons for prohibiting the patenting/copyright of genes, embryos, or their parts. Outline the arguments for both claims. What are some of issues to consider within the topic of genetic privacy, and what is the relationship between genetic privacy and genetic discrimination? Which of the traditional ethical theories are employed by those in the field of environmental ethics? Explain the relationship between traditional ethical theories and modern environmental ethics.

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Paraphrasing

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $30

Words 825

Pages 3

Completed in 1 day

Expert chelahmilcah

Client Review

Fantastic work!

Positive
05.18.2016

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Marx's State and Property

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Assignment 1

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

The Continental Difference

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Activity

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Question 2

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Precise 6

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Phil Forums topics

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5