Richard the III Analysis

The following essay will provide a periodical analysis of Shakespeare’s publication “Richard the III,” expounding on how the characters actions as well as attitudes define their outcome. Richard the III Plot Overview and Analysis After a surging series of epic battles between the Lancaster royal family, and the Family of York, England becomes a hub that is defined by peace and overwhelming tranquillity, although the desire for power threatens the given aspect. King Edward is regarded to be a noble King, one who portrays all elements of a just, respectful and honourable ruler, an aspect that agitates the king’s younger brother Richard (Clemen 58). As the small brother, Edward is filled with rage, often resenting the happiness and power of people around him, especially those associated with King Edward’s favour.

In addition to this, King Richard is angered by his present physical deformity, an aspect that provokes him to be power-hungry to replace Edward the IV, an element that is compelled by Richard’s lust for malice, and bitterness. In addition to this, the vicious, spiteful and vengeful King orders the arrest and execution of Edwards’s children relatives on the mother side, including the powerful kinsmen that served at the protection of Queen Elizabeth herself. With the security surrounding Edward’s wife, Queen Elizabeth removed Richard as the protector of England in unison with his allies such as Lords Buckingham, who was Richard’s right hand embark on a quest that seeks to crown the “protector of England” as the new King.

His campaign culminates with the imprisonment of Edward’s fully grown daughter and now the princess, as well as the execution of the genuine King’s last two daughters (Shakespeare 45). At this moment, England becomes overwhelmed by the “protector of England reign of terror” this aspect culminates and manifests in the form of terror, fear and loathe, elements that result in Richard’s alienation by nearly all of the noblemen that graced the court. With rumours circulating about the protector evil plans to ascend the throne, the public receives the hope of a possible threat to Richard’s evil and tomentum rule in the throne. Main Character Analysis (Richard the III vs. King Richmond) Richard the III Authoritative Monarch When analyzing the Character of Richard the III, one interesting aspect that emerges is the ability of the King to personate confidence on numerous levels, He appears to be in total command of every situation that is exposed to him in way, an aspect that makes every form of dissimulation no matter the difficulty appears to be a minor task.

It is crucial to note that as a King, Richard is ruthless and arrogant, an aspect that makes his superiority stir feelings of hatred, remorse, the terror of pity (Alexander 45). Just as Lagos, King Richard manifests as an individual who believes in the maximum sway of will-wielded individuals, based on their ability to mould passion depending on their determinations, of how conscious or unconscious they feel about their character. Domineering Ruler The second aspect that defines Richard Branson leadership is that he invests in his pride and selfish passion. Ideally the aspect of being able to transform people’s lives for good is a factor that the King enjoys, as well as motivates him to remain actively involved in the agitation for the people of England’s redemption against the evil treachery of Richard’s reign, an aspect that was nurtured by his extension to the human services role.

He as the new King of England appreciates witnessing the success of family reunification, the growth of the society, education of his subjects as well as accomplishments, self-worth and also life purpose improvement (Shakespeare 71). The King was noble as he puts more effort into trying to accomplish the dreams of a better England Kingdom becoming a reality. Cumulatively drawing from his actions, King Richmond’s energy is in part by the hope of reuniting the two houses of England, Lancaster, and York, that were constantly in conflict (Mitchell et al. 888), an aspect that compelled him to do something in a bid to provoke the kingdom to emerge as a better and healthier place, one where every individual is concerned with the welfare of each other, as well as the capacity to serve the King.