Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Theories of studies that affect us (Example)

Document Preview:

Name Tutor Course Date Face Integration Theory and Politics in the United States Introduction The cultural differences in the world today greatly influences relationships and handling of disputes. The theory helps define the status quo of different countries in the world and how the perceive each one in various handling various global issues. The perception of status quo of some countries by others is well explained through the political platform. In this paper I analyze the current United States political development that has widely paid the global attention. The paper follows the format of first describing the context secondly definition of the face negotiation theory and its development thirdly the interrelationship of the theory and political developments on the United States. Lastly the paper develops a reasonable implication from the study. Case A close analyzes of the United States political context has brought out issues that need a global attention the political development in United States has examined power in the context of political platform and its application in the world. Detailed theory its application in today campaigns in the United States and its implication. Work cited Benet-Martínez Verónica and Ying-yi Hong. The Oxford Handbook of Multicultural Identity. 2014. Print. Donsbach Wolfgang. The Concise Encyclopedia of Communication. 2015. Internet resource. Power Line Communications: Theory and Applications for Narrowband and Broadband Communciations Over Power Lines. Hoboken N.J: Wiley 2013. Internet resource. Anatory J and N Theethayi. Broadband Power-Line Communications Systems: Theory & Applications. Southampton: WIT 2010. Print. Wilkins Karin G. Redeveloping Communication for Social Change: Theory Practice and Power. Lanham Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2000. Print. Power & Communication Cables. United States: Inst of Electrical Elec Engrs Serv Ctr 2000. Print. Jansen Sue C. Critical Communication Theory: New Media Science Technology and Gender. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield 2002. Print. [...]

Order Description:

Instructions: In a 6-8 page paper (not including title and reference pages), analyze a personal experience, a scene from a movie (or a book or a play), or from a current event through the lens of at least two of the theories discussed this semester. Before submitting, make sure to refer to the case study outline, rubric, sample case study, and the video lecture describing how to do a case study. Be sure to use at least 5 scholarly references. One should be the reading material. Studies discussed: FACE NEGOTIATION THEORY I like to think of "face" as "self-esteem" or how someone's personhood is perceived by others. The theory uses the lens of intercultural communication, but I think this is applicable on a much broader scale. I think we have all experienced this. Most of our conflicts are truly face negotiations. I think a lot of times we don't necessarily care about the topic of the argument, but care about how the communication makes us feel and how it reflects on us. In other words, this theory is not about physical facial expressions. It is about how we feel about ourselves and how we think others feel about us. The struggle is when someone makes us feel lesser or when we think that they see us as something other than what we want. Sometimes we deal with that by bringing the other person down, but sometimes we deal with it by trying to make ourselves look better. You have probably known this for a long time, but just didn't have the name of the theory to go with the phenomenon. POWER We have all heard the phrase "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." I would like to rephrase that as "power is in the eye of the beholder." Each person decides who has what power. It isn't something tangible. Let's talk about a work relationship. I am a non-permanent employee of McNeese. My supervisor is Ray Miles. Let's say he decided that he wanted me to use a textbook for this class. I obviously don't want to do that. I perceive that he has power over my actions because he is my supervisor. However, I can choose not to teach at McNeese. (This is not a real situation. This is just an example. Don't freak out.) At the point that I have choices, I have diminished his power over my actions. We all always have choices. As long as I perceive that I have a choice, we are the sole owners of the power. In every situation, we have a certain amount of power. We have the power of our emotional response. We have the power of how we decide to communicate. We have the power to decide to end a relationship, leave the situation, quit the job, revisit the discussion later, etc. We have the power of making choices. We have the power to weigh the consequences and the benefits of our responses to other people's actions. That is the only real, tangible power.

Subject Area: Psychology

Document Type: Reports

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $60

Words 1925

Pages 7

Completed in 1 day

Expert writerkevin

Client Review

does great!

Positive
05.06.2016

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

#3 psy 305

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Learning Experience Paper

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Article Critique Paper

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Perception and Cognition

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Money-Back Guarantee

Support 24/7

No Hidden Charges

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5