Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Final Argument Paper (Example)

Document Preview:

Social Media Hindering Interpersonal Relationships Name Institutional Affiliation Introduction In this new digital age comprising of smartphones millennials and some older people are enveloped in the use of social media. The advancement in technology has promoted the frequent use of the internet to meet different needs of human beings. The internet has enabled businesses to thrive through the development of e commerce where trading partners can transact on the virtual market space. In addition several websites that serve as online dating platforms have been on the rise. However the gradual increase in the usage of internet in nearly every aspect of human life spells doom for humanity. This paper attempts to justify how the prevalence of social media is a hindrance to interpersonal relations. Premise 1: Interpersonal relationships require personal attention from both parties Premise 2: Social media users get addicted spending much time online having no time for the alienation from friends development of poor communication skills among addicts as well as time wastage on the platforms. The opposing views that tend to weaken my argument are also elaborated and it is evident that they do not meet the threshold to nullify my argument. It is therefore quite to conclude that social media is indeed a hindrance to interpersonal relationships. References Guerrero L. K. Andersen P. A. & Afifi W. A. (2017). Close encounters: Communication in relationships. Sage Publications. Paul A. (2014). Is online better than offline for meeting partners? Depends: are you looking to marry or to date? Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking 17(10) 664-667. Sarvamangala D. (2016). Effects of Social Media. International Journal Of Scientific Research And Education 4(06). Valkenburg P. M. & Peter J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction opportunities and risks. Journal of adolescent health 48(2) 121-127 [...]

Order Description:

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented. You will continue to build on the arguments that you are presented in your previous two papers. In particular,, you will present a final improved version of your argument for your thesis that you begin for the Week One Assignment and fully address the objection that you developed for your Week Three Assignment. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the [email protected] Tutorial (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. instructional resource.) Write: in your paper Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words] For help crafting a good thesis statement (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., go to the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words] If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit. Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words] Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source. Explain a strongobjectionto your argument. [Approximately 250 words] Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information. Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words] Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections. Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words] The Final Argument Paper Must be 1,100 to 1,400 words in length, double-spaced, (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Thesis Statement

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $40

Words 1100

Pages 4

Completed in 4 days

Expert Abigal

Client Review

Thanks again Abigal, you're amazing.

Positive
07.31.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Thesis Statement

Philosophy Term Paper

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Thesis Statement

What is a true belief

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5