Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Is It Ever Permissible To Torture? (Example)

Document Preview:

IS IT EVER PERMISSIBLE TO TORTURE? Name Course Professor Institution Date For a long time torture has been practiced in countries globally. Notwithstanding the reality that torture is the most unacceptable and horrible way of punishing people numerous countries still torture citizens. It seems that many kinds of association and particularly U.N. try to eradicate torture completely but it is difficult and long road to achieve this. It is well known that torture has been used since the beginning of humankind. Regardless of the fact that many conventions’ codes and declarations were implemented to stop torture worldwide the most significant one seems to be the declaration on protecting all people from torture. Protecting people from torture is important since it helps innocent people from being harmed during the torturing process. Torture has been useful for centuries when it is used to get information from tourists with many act normally. In conclusion Torture not only put lives of numerous populace safe but it is also used to demonstrate a symbol that we are not going to be frightened of anybody no matter how intimidating or powerful they may be. This is why I feel like anybody who says torment is aggressive and a dishonor to human beings next time take the time to think about how fortunate you are to get out of bed daily having an enjoyable and safe day that a terrorist might have shattered if they had the chance. References Miller S. (2005). Is torture ever morally justifiable?. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19(2) 179-192. Jaggar A. M. (2005). What is terrorism why is it wrong and could it ever be morally permissible?. Journal of Social Philosophy 36(2) 202-217. Allhoff F. (2003). Terrorism and torture. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17(1) 121-134. [...]

Order Description:

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented. You will continue to build on the arguments that you are presented in your previous two papers. In particular,, you will present a final improved version of your argument for your thesis that you begin for the Week One Assignment and fully address the objection that you developed for your Week Three Assignment. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the [email protected] Tutorial instructional resource.) Write: in your paper Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words] For help crafting a good thesis statement, go to the Ashford Writing Center. Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words] If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit. Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words] Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source. Explain a strong objection to your argument. [Approximately 250 words] Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information. Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words] Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections. Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]

Subject Area: Law

Document Type: Reports

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $30

Words 825

Pages 3

Completed in 2 days

Expert William Smith

Client Review

Professional . always finishes ahead of deadline. Will continue using as my writer

Positive
05.28.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Genetic Challenges

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Your Choice

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Initial Client Interview

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Law 4B

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Law 7 b

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Case Law

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Reports

Law State and Citizen

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Money-Back Guarantee

Support 24/7

No Hidden Charges

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5