Hobbes and Plato both designed images of an excellent state, predicated on their accounts of individuals nature. Hobbes possessed a far more negatively skewed view of individuals nature; a materialistic view, while Plato essentially presumed that humans are inherently good. This essay will discuss how their differing views are conveyed in their imagined claims, and subsequently will critically compare both. Thomas Hobbes acquired a materialistic viewpoint; he placed a mechanistic view of the world. In his opinion, human nature is the the put together consequence of mechanic desires and aversions, arbitrated by continuous power problems.