Document preview:

he is still a very persistent character who will fight until justice is served fairly. Juror 8 is a convincing man who presents his arguments perfectly but he can also be said to be manipulative due to his acute arguing skills. This can be proved when he kept provoking Juror 3 until he (Juror 3) swore to kill him (Juror 8). Juror 8 did this to show that saying “I’m going to kill you” does not necessarily mean that he was going to kill him for real. Juror 3 is like the complete opposite of Juror 8. He is a stubborn man with sometimes baseless arguments. Juror 3 is intolerant of other people’s opinions slightly sadistic and short tempered. He has a grudge with younger people than him after his son punched him in the face. He has the character of a bully as he pushed the quieter Jurors around and in the end he was isolated from the other jurors due to his behavior. Juror 3 allowed his personal bias to cloud his judgment and left him to personalize age. This is seenthe other members of the...

$25
Essay (57 pages)
English
Enter valid email

Comparison /contrast of two characters in the film 12 angry men 1957

Young H
This authors's rating is: 5 (240 reviews)

48 in English

374 completed projects

This might be interesting

Top work's preview
jasonborrayo127
This work's rating is: 0
Top work's preview
user2173480
This work's rating is: 0
Top work's preview
October Sky
devmien
This work's rating is: 4.2
Top work's preview
devmien
This work's rating is: 4.2
Top work's preview
devmien
This work's rating is: 4.2