Student’s Name Professor’s Name Subject Date Early Italian Renaissance vs. High Renaissance styles High Renaissance represents a style of Italian painting which was unique for the pictures were self- contained with a total balance with a point of focus that was distinct. The design was dominant during the period of high pick exploration of the activities of the quattrocento (Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly pg. 450-500 2014). The high quality of balance and harmony makes the art style to be dignified and calm at the same time. In comparison to the Early Renaissance Galatea has an intense sense of depth due to the combination of sfumato and chiaroscuro perceptions. Thus the image creates a believable space which has a light source that captures the horizon. In the both paintings however the symbolism was evident as the two artists would represent the cultural norms and practices that bind the community members together with gender roles. Works Cited Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly. Society culture and person: A systems view of creativity. Springer Netherlands 2014. Seigel Jerrold E. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism. Princeton University Press 2015. [...]
Many art historians consider the High Renaissance style a culmination of the goals of the Early Renaissance. What were those goals and how did High Renaissance artists bring them into fruition? Address these issues in a composition in your own words and paste it into a discussion post as well as upload the file to turnitin.com (see announcement with information on how to do that). Be sure to: -thoroughly address the topic of style -use and define High Renaissance vocabulary -show examples of your points by comparing an Early Italian Renaissance painting (c. 1400-1490) to one of a similar subject matter by Leonardo Da Vinci or Raphael of your choosing. How do the two works compare in terms of style, composition and treatment of subject matter? Do you think the High Renaissance work is an improvement from the Early Renaissance style? Why? -explain the ways the High Renaissance style reflected the historical context of Italy 1494-1521 when possible If you can't decide what to choose, you may consider my suggestion here: Botticelli's 'Birth of Venus' (Early Renaissance) vs. Raphael's 'Galatea' (High Renaissance. Why compare and contrast? The compare and contrast essay is a popular method for discussing works of art first popularized by legendary art historian and college professor Heinrich Wölfflin (1864-1945) who saw it as a way for his students to practice the craft of observation and analysis of works of art. Here are some guidelines for you to consider when writing your comparison. These comparisons are intended to stimulate you to explore the similarities and differences between the period styles of the two works of art compared, and /or the individual styles of the two artists who created them. You may also explore not only the stylistic differences between the two works but discuss the effect that these stylistic differences had on the subject matter, theme or symbolism of the works. In comparing them you look for similarities while in contrasting you look for differences. In any compare and contrast analysis begin with the basics such as identifying the work of art (artist, title, period/style) and giving a description of the work and its special features. The following is a list of issues to consider in this analysis as well as any other in and art history class: artist Who produced it or is the artist unknown? period/style What category of art historical eras does it fall into. E.g.: High Renaissance, Mannerist, Venetian Renaissance, etc. function What was its primary, intended use or purpose? Who was the patron? Was the function religious or secular, political or apolitical, public or private? Is there an intended message for the viewer? physical context Where was it supposed to be displayed? How does it relate to its environment? Where was it located? is it still 'in situ'? description of style What does it look like? What is its medium - materials it is made of? Size? What colors does it use? Is the composition static or dynamic? Colorful or monochromatic? analysis of style Why does it look that way? Did the choice of materials or processes used effect its appearance? Is the style borrowed or developed from an earlier style or is it original or both? Is it naturalistic or abstracted from nature? Is it realistic or idealistic? Here is where you need to apply your knowledge to explain the style. subject matter Who or what is the subject? Is it religious or secular? Narrative or non-narrative? Is it a genre scene, landscape, portrait, still-life, or 'historical'? Is there a use of symbolism or iconography? (Note: This topic doesn't apply to architecture.) cultural/historical context What was going on historically, socially, politically, religiously during the period in which it was produced? In what ways does the work reflect its era? The times and place the artist lived in are a VERY important consideration in attempting to understand a piece of art!