CREATED ON 25th September 2018
COMPLETED ON 26th September 2018
Expert hired: SmartMind

Assignment #2 – Applying the Theory of Utilitarianism to a Case Study

This assignment requires you to use the second skill I said you would be developing in this course, the ability to make your own well-constructed argument. Start by reading Case #1 on page 91 (this is a real case addressing the same issue described in the example on page 29). Now, I want you to build a utilitarian argument that supports the Schaibles (the religious couple in case 1). I suspect that for some of you it will be difficult to write an argument that supports the parents, but that is part of the challenge, to understand someone whose moral reasoning might be very different from your own. You will start your argument with the standard of utilitarianism (premise 1). Then, you will list both good and bad consequences (pains and pleasures) of the Schaibles’ actions (premises 2-5). You will then weigh the pains and pleasures in premises 2-5 against each other (premise 6). Finally you will write your conclusion which says that what the Schaibles did was right because the good consequences outweigh the bad. We will work up to full paragraphs in assignment #3 next week, but this argument should only be 7 sentences long, and it should look like this: Premise #1: The right thing to do is that which creates the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Happiness is gaining pleasure or relieving pain. Premise #2: List a pain caused OR pleasure lost by the Schaibles’ actions and say to whom it was caused. Premise #3: List another pain caused OR pleasure lost by the Schaibles’ actions and say to whom it was caused. Premise #4: List a pleasure caused OR pain relieved by the Schaibles’ actions and say to whom it was caused. Premise #5: List another pleasure caused OR pain relieved by the Schaibles’ actions and say to whom it was caused. Premise #6: Weigh the good consequences listed in premises 4 & 5 against the bad consequences listed in premises 2 & 3 to show that the good outweighs the bad. Conclusion: According to utilitarianism, what the Schaibles did was right because it brought greater happiness to a greater number. When you write your argument, you can just copy premise #1 and the conclusion as they are written. So, what you are required to do is to create the content for premises 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6. Different people will come up with different pains and pleasures, but the two important things are: 1. Read the directions for premises 2-5 carefully so that you are listing both good and bad consequences of the Schaibles’ actions – that is what makes it a dilemma. If the consequences were all good or all bad, there would be no debate; it is because both pains and pleasures were produced that it requires moral reasoning (in this case applying the theory of utilitarianism) to know how to respond. 2. Be sure to include pains and pleasures to people other than the immediate family, since Mill’s version of utilitarianism requires you to consider the happiness of all who could possibly be affected. Look again at the case about “Johnny” from the bottom left through the top right of page 37 for an example of the many people whose happiness might be affected and in what ways by that particular case. You should do the same with the Schaible case.
This project has already been completed on Studybay
On Studybay you can order your academic assignment from one of our 45000 project experts. Hire your expert directly, without overpaying for agencies and affiliates!
Check the price for your project

See other similar orders

Studybay assignment progress timeline

Studybay is a freelance platform where you can order a Assignment #2 – Applying the Theory of Utilitarianism to a Case Study paper, written from scratch by professors and tutors.
25 September 2018
User created a project for Economics
25 September 2018
15 experts responded
25 September 2018
User contacted expert SmartMind
25 September 2018
User hired expert SmartMind who offered a price of $40 for the project and has experience doing similar projects
26 September 2018
The expert completed the project Assignment #2 – Applying the Theory of Utilitarianism to a Case Study for 1 day, meeting the deadline
26 September 2018
User accepted the project right away and completed the payment
26 September 2018
User left a positive review

Other projects in this subject area

Random blog posts

Importance of and benefits of e-banking
E Banking The usage of e banking by the businesses had become in middle 90's. e bank had become in greater amounts because of low operating costs. First it is in the form of ATM's and cellphone transactions. Recently it altered to internet a new channel between customers and finance institutions which benefits both. The main goal of e- banking services is to provide the customers a considerably faster services with low cost. From the last twenty years, banking sector has chosen a new method of bank based on the improvement of information technology. Furthermore to these customers, exchange and communication abilities are fastened predicated on it. The progress of electronic banking started out with use of automated teller machines and after it developed to online bank. In the foreseeable future it'll be done in mobile phones(wap-enabled).
Stakeholder management in tourism and hospitality
2. Framework of the tourism and hospitality industry and role of stakeholders: (Burcu & Ozgur, 2008) The stakeholders needs and demands are grasped and taken care of immediately by organizations, predicated on the concept of stakeholder management. Regarding to (Svendsen, 1998), the key role of stakeholder management is to safeguard the organization from the detrimental impacts of the activities of the stakeholder. Some techniques like assessment, issue analysis, strategic communications, and formal deals or agreements should be utilized by the business. (Huber, Scharioth, & Pallas, 2004), explained that organizations strive to gain the trust of the main stakeholders, who've a greater impact about them and with whom they may have constructive interactions.