SUBJECT AREA English Language
CREATED ON 18th September 2018
COMPLETED ON 19th September 2018
Expert hired: SmartMind

ENC1101 - Unit 1 Paper 2: Navigating Sources That Disagree

BACKGROUND In this first unit, we’ll be discussing how both writers and readers play an active role in constructing texts. As you’ll see, understanding the rhetorical situation is pivotal in both engaging and creating texts, so for this first assignment you’ll be asked to analyze and synthesize conflicting sources of information. In doing so, you’ll do more than simply summarize and compile information; instead, you’ll take part in the active generation of meaning. ASSIGNMENT Choose an issue or topic that is currently being publicly discussed and find three sources on it from newspapers, magazines, academic journals, or speeches that disagree with each other. Demonstrate your understanding of rhetorical situations and their constituents, rhetorical reading strategies, and rhetorical writing strategies by writing an analysis that does not simply summarize the sources, but explains and argues why and how the construction is different and, therefore, lends to them not being able to agree. In most instances, each rhetor has a different audience, but because of that fact, how are the texts constructed differently? What are the constraint differences? What “roles” do the authors play? How do the different audiences apply constraints to the authors? Remember that this is not a position paper. It is not your job here to decide who is “right” and who is “wrong” but rather to rhetorically analyze the sources and write about the differences. You’ll need to actively read and analyze the sources to learn as much as possible and understand each individual rhetorical situation. This includes information about the authors and their audiences. Then, when you write the essay, you’ll be pulling pertinent information from your analyses to support your argument as to why the sources are constructed differently. For all of your observations and claims about a text you should have supporting evidence from the text itself. What to do: Look for your sources in editorials, articles, or from commentary writers. Make sure that these sources have gone through some kind of editorial process before being published. This means that someone posting their opinions on a blog or discussion board is not an appropriate source. Consider choosing sources from various media (print, digital, etc) Pick the most relevant reasons why the constructions are different and describe those in your analysis (this becomes your thesis). Some points to consider: Even “facts” are rhetorically constituted and often open to interpretation. Remember that each writer both joins and plays a role in constructing the rhetorical situation for their individual text. Resist binary thinking, the idea that there are only two sides to every issue. This is not a pro/con paper. Be sure to note the effect of any constraints on a given text—either assets or liabilities. Use the analytical terms from class and the readings to analyze the sources. The content of the articles we’ve read should guide your analysis. Be sure to cite them when you use their ideas. Find texts that are trying to persuade the audience in some way. While all texts can be rhetorically analyzed, it is easier to do when you can tell that the author has a purpose for his or her writing. Things not to do: Do not argue your own opinion on the issue. Regardless of how you feel about the issue, it should never be directly stated. Instead, it’s your job to persuasively answer a question about who is saying what, and why are they saying it? Do not simply summarize the texts or what others have said about the texts. Do not simply summarize everything you found out about the texts and their rhetorical situations in your analyses. Pick and choose the elements that contribute to your position. Do not assume that the text is simply objective, liberal, or conservative, etc. If you are going to make such observations and claims about a text, then back them up with examples and evidence from the text itself. You will be responsible for submitting possible sources for class discussion. You must have approval from me for your sources before you begin drafting your paper. Format and other info: Six to Eight pages (not including the Works Cited page), Times New Roman (double spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point font) Name and page number is upper-right header Final essay must follow MLA format (see example, UCF Writes or Perdue OWL) *Please contact me with any questions you may have on the sources you select for this paper*
This project has already been completed on Studybay
On Studybay you can order your academic assignment from one of our 45000 project experts. Hire your expert directly, without overpaying for agencies and affiliates!
Check the price for your project

See other similar orders

Studybay assignment progress timeline

Studybay is a freelance platform where you can order a ENC1101 - Unit 1 Paper 2: Navigating Sources That Disagree paper, written from scratch by professors and tutors.
18 September 2018
User created a project for English Language
18 September 2018
18 experts responded
18 September 2018
User contacted expert SmartMind
18 September 2018
User hired expert SmartMind who offered a price of $30 for the project and has experience doing similar projects
19 September 2018
The expert completed the project ENC1101 - Unit 1 Paper 2: Navigating Sources That Disagree for 1 day, meeting the deadline
19 September 2018
User accepted the project right away and completed the payment
19 September 2018
User left a positive review

Other projects in this subject area

Random blog posts

Cats and dogs compare and contrast essay
Writing a cats and dogs compare and contrast essay is an interesting and funny assignment. It is something that will help you get new knowledge about your favorite pets and find out a host of fascinating facts that might surprise you. In case you have a dog or a cat at home, or both of them, it will be an easy task to do. It is known that all people are divided into two categories: a cat-person (who likes cats) and a dog-person (who adores dogs). In this kind of assignment, you do not need to choose your position, but instead, you need only to provide a comparison of two kinds of animals and give interesting facts. At the same time, when writing a cats and dogs compare and contrast essay , you are going to follow a certain strategy, technique and structure of writing your paper, which you are going to find below.
Definition and the five phases of perception
Perception is the procedure which people know about objects and situations in the exterior world. Perception occurs in five periods: stimulation, organization, interpretation-evaluation, storage and recall. People studied perception as the necessity to solve a specific problems, occur simply from intellectual fascination with themselves and the earth. It's important to know precisely what kind of perceptual demands can fairly be located on real human senses without compromising safe practices and sanity (Russell & Ward, 1982). The analysis of perception one can identify and appropriate potentially unsafe environment conditions that threaten the senses and impair the capability to make decision. Perception is defined as procedure for one's ultimate connection with the world and requires further control of sensory input.
Strategic business management and planning coca cola company
In the precise of science Business planning is often described as more than of an art. In organizations this becomes especially true when ones business strategies revolve around the cycle of gross annual budgeting. At this point, business analysts with common of experience in the business exert the alleged "spreadsheets from hell" that a small number of folks can be familiar with modifying them by themselves. In others in comparison with Coca Cola budgeting entail continuous revisions and edits to a large number of incoherent spreadsheets. This type of twelve-monthly budgeting cycles are costly in both time and require more folks resources, and they are generally determined by prior background, relatively to a company's strategic plans.