Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Concept Analysis (Example)

Document Preview:

Concept Analysis Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation March 21 2018 Introduction One of the most frequently utilized concepts in clinical practice and theory is self-care. It is presently the best method for managing chronic conditions such as diabetes and cancer. No particular theory that has superiority over the other. Rather it is the usefulness to practice that validates it. This study adopts the nursing concept of self-care. A definition of the concept refers to events and attitudes adding to the upkeep of wellbeing. Orem’s theory comprises of three related parts: the self-care nursing systems and the self-care deficit theories. The one for self-care describes the practices that someone initiates and implements on his/her behalf to sustain health life as well as well-being. Self-care deficit theory provides a clarification into how and why people can be assisted through nursing. On the other side the theory of nursing systems defines associations between E22-E31. Sanchez-Reilly S. Morrison L. J. Carey E. Bernacki R. O’Neil L. Kapo J. … & deLima Thomas J. (2013). Caring for oneself to care for others: physicians and their self-care. The Journal of supportive oncology 11(2) 75. Segall A. and Goldstein J. (1998). “Exploring the Correlates of Self-provided Health Care Behaviour”. In Coburn David; D’Arcy Alex; Torrance George Murray. Health and Canadian Society: Sociological Perspectives. University of Toronto Press. Pp. 279-280. ISBN 0802080529. Stupiansky N. W. Hanna K. M. Slaven J. E. Weaver M. T. & Fortenberry J. D. (2013). Impulse control diabetes-specific self-efficacy and diabetes management among emerging. Wickman U. L. Yngman-Uhlin P. Hjortswang H. Riegel B. Stjernman H. & Frisman G. H. (2016). Self-care among patients with inflammatory Bowel Disease: an interview study. Gastroenterology Nursing 39(2) 121. Wilde M. H. & Garvin S. A. (2007). A concept analysis of self-monitoring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57(3) 339-350. [...]

Order Description:

Purpose This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept supported by a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession. Course Outcomes CO 1: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5) CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1) Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4 Total Points Possible: 250 Points Requirements Description of the Assignment This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept that is important and useful to nursing. The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases. Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis. Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis. Criteria for Content Introduction The introduction substantively presents all the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept. Names the sections of the paper. Scholarly support is required. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept This section includes: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required. Literature review This section requires: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. Support from nursing literature is required. Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review. Defining attributes, for this section: A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed. Antecedent and Consequence This section requires the identification of: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept. Empirical Referents This section requires the identification of: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept. Construct Cases Explanation: hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept. This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes Explanation: A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this cas Explanation: Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing. Theoretical Applications of the Concept Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. Conclusion This section requires: Summarization of key information regarding: Selected nursing concept. Selected nursing theory. Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice). The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.) Preparing the Assignment Criteria for Format and Special Instructions The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing. PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases. Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment. Adaptation Burnout Caring Comfort Compassion Compassion fatigue Competence Cultural humility Empowerment Engagement Health Leadership Meaningfulness Modeling Noise Pain Palliative care Quality of life Resilience Self-care Sensory overload Situational awareness Rubric W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction 10.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. 9.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. 8.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. 4.0 pts Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept 25.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources. 22.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources. 20.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources. 10.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Literature Review 35.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. 31.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. 28.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. 13.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Defining Attributes 25.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided. 22.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided. 20.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided. 10.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Antecedents & Consequences 25.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 22.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 20.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 10.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Empirical Referents 20.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 18.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 16.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided. 8.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Construct Cases 30.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. 26.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. 24.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. 11.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Theoretical Applications of the Concept 30.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. 26.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required 24.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. 11.0 pts Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion 10.0 pts Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis. 9.0 pts Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis. 8.0 pts Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis. 4.0 pts Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis. 0.0 pts Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paper Specifications 20.0 pts This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. 18.0 pts This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. 16.0 pts This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. 8.0 pts This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. 0.0 pts This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format (6th edition) 10.0 pts APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present 9.0 pts APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 - 3 APA errors were present 8.0 pts APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present 4.0 pts APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present 0.0 pts APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citations 5.0 pts There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty. 4.0 pts There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty. 3.0 pts There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2.0 pts There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 0.0 pts There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Quality 5.0 pts 1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 4.0 pts 3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 3.0 pts 5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 2.0 pts 7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 0.0 pts 9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 5.0 pts Total Points: 250.0

Subject Area: Nursing

Document Type: Research Paper

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $40

Words 1375

Pages 5

Completed in 9 days

Expert Mukiti

Client Review

GREAT JOB!

Positive
03.25.2018

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Nursing   Type of the project is Research Paper

 Editing and Revising

Subject of the project is Nursing   Type of the project is Research Paper

Nursing Care Models

Subject of the project is Nursing   Type of the project is Research Paper

Writer Choice

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Money-Back Guarantee

Support 24/7

No Hidden Charges

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5