Constitutionality of NAFTA

Therefore, the US government has accentuated on international trade and regional integration as one of the ways of improving economic growth. NAFTA is one the trade agreement which was made by US government as part of the regional integration. However, such trade agreements are made in accordance with the constitution which is the supreme law of the land. The legal document mirrors the will and sovereign of the people (Metropoulos, 1994). Power to make treaties and regulate commerce The North America Free Trade Agreement was created with the noble intention of spurring trade in the three countries. Consequently, the US President and the representatives of the house gained the approval of the Senate to revise forging policy. North America Free Trade Agreement is therefore constitutional since it terms and formation is anchored in the constitution which happens to the supreme law of the land.

Besides, the treaty had an agreement which the party involved consented unanimously. The treaty also creates provision under which the agreement might come to an end. However, critics of the government have constantly questioned the legality of the agreement by focusing on the shortcoming has created. Textiles and furniture from the Canada and Mexico have led to the close down of plants in the state which has rendered a huge portion of the population jobless (Thomas & James, 2017). Therefore, the sectors play a fundamental role in the economy of North Carolina by the creation of revenues to the dweller. Nevertheless, the textiles have termed as a sector that feeding directly into apparel, yet textiles & apparel is an expansive sector. Currently, the textile industry in Carolina is at a crossroad as it endeavors to maintain their leadership as a global provider of textiles.