CREATED ON 30th December 2017
COMPLETED ON 31st December 2017
Expert hired: Globalwriter

Compare and Contrast Models and Approaches to Evaluation

Instructions For this assignment, write a paper in which you provide a critical evaluation and comparison of four (4) models of evaluation presented above (one must be the Kirkpatrick model). Include the following in your paper: • Determine which models or approaches seem similar or compatible, and then explain the ways in which they are similar or compatible. • Explain which models or approaches have different orientations. Determine how these differences might manifest themselves in an evaluation. • Identify the models or approaches that would fit within the context of the organization or organizations with which you typically work. • Discuss when and how you think one decides which models and approaches to use for any one evaluation. • Recommend criteria to use to determine the most appropriate model and approach for a given evaluation context. • Discuss the implications of using various evaluation models and approaches for an evaluation study in your organization and in general. Support your assignment with at least 6 scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included. Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages Many evaluation approaches and models have emerged since the 1930s and 1940s. Worthen et al. (1997) categorized evaluation approaches into six categories: 1. Objectives-oriented, 2. Management-oriented, 3. Consumer-oriented, 4. Expertise-oriented, 5. Adversary-oriented, and 6. Participant-oriented. Specific attention has been given by researchers to additions to these categories. Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Approach (reaction, learning, behavior, and results) to training evaluation is a very popular model to use and has served as the primary organizing design. This week, you will compare and contrast models of evaluation and determine when and how to choose a model or approach for an organization. Review the resources listed in the Books and Resources area below to prepare for this week’s assignment(s). It is also recommended that you research the following models: a. Tyler’s Objectives Approach (behaviorally-oriented approach) (1949) b. Kirkpatick’s (1959 – and recently updated) Learning Evaluation Model c. CIRO (Content, Input, Reaction, and Outcome model (Bird et al., 1970) Input, Process, Output, Outcome (IPO) d. Model (Bushnell, 1990) e. Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) f. Model (Worthen & Sanders, 1987) g. Training Validation System (TVS) Approach (Fitz-Enz, 1994) h. Input, Process, Output, Outcome (IPO) Model (Bushnell, 1990)
This project has already been completed on Studybay
On Studybay you can order your academic assignment from one of our 45000 project experts. Hire your expert directly, without overpaying for agencies and affiliates!
Check the price for your project

See other similar orders

Studybay assignment progress timeline

Studybay is a freelance platform where you can order a Compare and Contrast Models and Approaches to Evaluation paper, written from scratch by professors and tutors.
30 December 2017
User created a project for Education
30 December 2017
18 experts responded
30 December 2017
User contacted expert Globalwriter
30 December 2017
User hired expert Globalwriter who offered a price of $30 for the project and has experience doing similar projects
31 December 2017
The expert completed the project Compare and Contrast Models and Approaches to Evaluation for 1 day, meeting the deadline
31 December 2017
User accepted the project right away and completed the payment
31 December 2017
User left a positive review

Other projects in this subject area

Random blog posts

Evaluation of dior's resource chain strategy
Individually to get ready a 3000 expression document using your group analyzed company as a RESEARCH STUDY to compare their supply chain strategy against a thorough Literature Overview of supply chain best practice that you individuallyidentify as the thing is that appropriate to analyzing the research study organization. You must create a significant individual literature review during the course of the assignment. Introduction Many scholars and professionals have centered on areas such as operations, marketing and individuals source of information as main factors for strong performance and strategic competiveness, but still were not able to answer the primary question which is why firms still outperform one another?