Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Research Paper (Example)

Document Preview:

Comparison between the Marshall Plan and Cambodia Invasion Student’s name Course number Date Comparison between the Marshall Plan and Cambodia Invasion Designing a democracy where qualities of a top leader are expected to make an influence on political outcomes the results might look similar to the United States political system. There several key factors that determine a successful presidential leadership in the modern day. Each President had their own way of providing leadership to the people. In America history such cases have been witnessed with Harry Truman using the Marshall Plan and Richard Nixon’s Invasion of Cambodia. The Marshall Plan had a comprehensive idea of rehabilitating the European countries and one that made a historic success as it met its objectives. On the other hand the direct orders from President Nixon commanding the American troops to invade Cambodia and back South Vietnamese up was meant to shorten to Vietnam leading to possess great personality as it affects their leadership theories and styles. However leadership does not always guarantee success hence it is substantial to go back in history and learn to distinguish the successful leadership styles from those that are likely to fail. Bibliography Anslover Nicole L. Harry S. Truman: the coming of the Cold War. Routledge 2013. Calif. M. Mireille. (1997). Opinion. Truman Cautiously Promoted the Marshall Plan. Retrieved from: Lescaze Lee. (1979). Kissinger: Cambodia invasion was forced by Hanoi. Retrieved from: Pribbenow Merle L. "A Tale of Five Generals: Vietnam's Invasion of Cambodia." The Journal of Military History 70 no. 2 (2006): 459-486. Reston. James. Washington: 1987. The Marshall Plan. Retrieved from: Semple Jr. B. Robert. (1970). Nixon describes Cambodian drive as great success. New York Times Archives. pp.1. Vietnam: Ringing Down the Curtain. A & E Television Networks LLC. New York: Film Media Group. (2010). [...]

Order Description:

In 6-8 pages develop an argument about the key factors determining successful presidential leadership in the modern era (FDR forward). Your argument should be rooted in the scholarly literature on the presidency. Develop your argument in more detail by exploring two cases where a president attempted to provide leadership in some way. I think that the easiest way to do this would be to choose a policy or action widely viewed as a historical success and another that is widely viewed as a historical failure (e.g. - Truman’s Marshall Plan and Nixon’s invasion of Cambodia). However, you do not need to follow this mold. You could also compare two successes or two failures.

Subject Area: Politics

Document Type: Research Paper

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $50

Words 1650

Pages 6

Completed in 17504 days

Expert Phil

Client Review

Phil is the way to go. He always response in a timely matter and he's skilled in writing. He's a great choice for any essay.


Similar projects

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Research Paper

Research Paper

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Research Paper

Juan Gonzalez : Puerto Rico

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Research Paper

Uae and US foreign policy

Subject of the project is Politics   Type of the project is Research Paper

Ballot Proposition Analysis

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
  • Our SiteJabber rating is: