Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

The roles of evolutionary, sociocultural, and other contextual factors in determining human mate preferences. (Example)

Document Preview:

Factors Affect Mate Preference Student Name Institution Course Date Factors Affecting Mate Preference Introduction What techniques does one use to find a mate? This phrase tends to strike fear into the hearts of those in search for a perfect soul mate. Often enough this decision is the most crucial one to be made in one’s life. Notably different people possess different ideas regarding the choice of partners due to their different aesthetic standards. It has necessitated the psychologists and researchers to spend many dedicated hours conducting a study of the characteristics that people should put into consideration during the selection of a potential suitor. However the results have appeared to be surprising in most cases since stereotypes claim that looks alone are not a primary concern for people when deciding to bond in a romantic relationship with a particular partner. For this reason this paper seeks to prove the Psychology: Issues Ideas and Findings. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. Feingold A. (2012). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin 112 125- 139.Gangestad S. W. & Buss D. M. (2013). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology 14 89-96. Gangestad S.W. Haselton M.G. & Buss D.M. (in press). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry.Kalick S. M. Zebrowitz L. A. Langlois J. H. & Johnson R. M. (2011). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Li N. P. & Kenrick D. T. (2016). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short term mates: What whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 468-489 Marzoli D. Moretto F. Monti A. Tocci O. Roberts S. & Tommasi L. (2013). Environmental Influences on Mate Preferences as Assessed by a Scenario Manipulation Experiment. Retrieved 8 October 2017 from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074282 [...]

Order Description:

 Recommended reading the these three selections of pages from peer-reviewed articles:  Pages 365-370 in Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Evolutionary Psychology: A How-To Guide. American Psychologist, 72(4), 353–373.  Pages 1-14 in Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1- 49.  Page 164 (paragraph begins on Page 163) in Conway, L. G., III, & Schaller, M. (2002). On the verifiability of evolutionary psychological theories: an analysis of the psychology of scientific persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 152-166.

Subject Area: Psychology

Document Type: Reports

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $60

Words 2200

Pages 8

Completed in 13 days

Expert nickmugambi

Client Review

Prompt and very responsive, thank you

Positive
10.08.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

#3 psy 305

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Learning Experience Paper

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Article Critique Paper

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Reports

Perception and Cognition

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5