Religion essay

His views are quite important because, in them, one is able to get understanding the difference between non-denominations, charismatic, house churches as well as evangelical churches. From his work, one can use it in thinking about different varieties that are on offer within Christianity. According to his view, churches are said to be conservative. The interrelationship between churches and state is acceptable in his view and are seen to be driven by principles which are similar to those of the universe and able to involve the entire humanity that is under their support. Churches rank themselves on the “objective concrete holiness” described by the priesthood which is known to be the apostolic sacraments together with succession. They usually exist among the lower class members of the society that have no opportunity of getting deeper into the institutions.

In some cases, they might compromise against engaging in secular law, swearing to tell the truth in the courts or fighting their own country. In contrast to the view of churches, sects view early churches and New Testament to be permanent ideal which has the possibility of leading an individual into literal obedience and radicalism. This is one of the factors that they struggle in becoming big institutions and why they also need to constantly renew their ideal which in most cases seem to show lack of continuity affinity with the oppressed groups in the society and influenced individualism. By all these, it means that Christian life in sects seem to be very intense but lacking in the universalism since they cannot help but only look at the entire church as degenerate.

People should understand myths in the perspective of social function. In this case, myths have to be understood as or at other times as a way of explaining what cannot be easily explained by truth. According to this view of these myths, the human brain is made up of three layers namely personal unconscious, collective unconscious as well as conscious mind. Personal unconscious is about personal historical events throughout an individual’s life, while collective unconscious is what an individual can understand with the knowledge that such an individual has. Despite this being regarded as just a myth, there seems to be a certain truth in it in that the same case can be observed in both living as well as cultural patterns transiting from one generation to another.