Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Wk 4 Discussion 2 (Example)

Document Preview:

Respond to Jacqueline MarshallMy Teen Fallacy When my daughter was in her early teen I would frequently commit the slippery slope fallacy. The main cause for this error in argument was that my daughter would rarely confide in me. I was left in the dark about mostly everything and as a result my imagination would get the better of me to the hasty generalization fallacy that is in our learning materials. However the student has not presented the premises in a vertical order and it is upon the reader to search for her premises as well as the conclusion of the argument presented in the paragraphs.                                                            Reference The Museum of Hoaxes  (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.(http://www.hoaxes.org) [...]

Order Description:

Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first post in the discussion forum. The requirements for the discussion this week are a minimum of four posts on four separate days, including responses to at least two classmates.. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 600 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can. Your Most Common Fallacy We have all committed fallacies at one point or another in our lives, so for this discussion we ask you to reflect on the fallacy that you find that you commit the most frequently. Prepare: Read the assigned materials for this week, including the handouts (see the Announcements), the Instructor Guidance, and the textbook. Take good notes. Make a selection from the fallacies that are explained in that textbook (Make sure to choose a fallacy from the textbook for this course and not from any other source. Also, do not stop at the first fallacy that you recognize since your knowledge of all fallacies will not only enhance your overall knowledge, it will also come in handy for the second discussion). Reflect: Reflect on the fallacies that you have read and find the one that you commit the most. Think about how frequently you have committed the fallacy and what kinds of things tend to lead to you committing it. Write: Present an example of an argument (or arguments) that you have made that commits that particular fallacy. Present the reasoning in standard form. Evaluate your argument (or arguments): name, define, describe, and explain the fallacy that you committed and explain why this argument is fallacious. What might you do to avoid committing that type of fallacy in the future? How might learning to avoid this fallacy benefit your life? Guided Response: Respond to at least two (2) other intros in this forum by the end of day seven of this first week. Your goal should be to see if the classmate has exemplified the fallacy correctly and/or presented the description of the fallacy correctly as well. You might also mention if the fallacy in question is also an example of any other type of fallacy that we have studied. You may also examine the correctness of the standard form. Is it presented in the vertical fashion with premises on top and the conclusion at the end? Are the premises clearly presented? Any corrections or examples that you may offer your classmates will not only help your classmate learn the material, it will give you the practice that you need in order to learn the material yourself.

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Paraphrasing

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $25

Words 550

Pages 2

Completed in 2 days

Expert Abigal

Client Review

Great job again.

Positive
07.24.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Marx's State and Property

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Assignment 1

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

The Continental Difference

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Activity

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Question 2

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Machiavelli: What's New?

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Precise 6

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5