Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Annotated Bibliography (Example)

Document Preview:

Student’s Name Course and Code Tutor Date and time Annotated Bibliography Murray Nicholas P. "The Differential Effect of Team Cohesion and Leadership Behavior in High School Sports." Individual Differences Research 4.4 (2006). Murray’s study investigates the relation of coaching behavior team cohesion and performance in high school sports. He used the Group environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and the Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS) on nine high school soccer teams and nine high school baseball teams. The first hypothesis showed that higher levels of task and social cohesion were related to higher levels of positive feedback training and instructions and social support. The lAst hypothesis was also looks at the role of football managers in the UK and comes up with a framework for selecting an effective manager. According to the article a football manager is more complex and dynamic compared to a traditional coach. The entire success of the team is placed on the shoulders of the team manager. He not only has to coach but also requires the skills to select and retain the best people. This means technical football skills are not enough but traditional management skills are also paramount. The research suggests that an effective football manager has the following dominant traits: adaptability self-confidence and persistence. [...]

Order Description:

In preparation for your final paper it will be important that you to locate 5 journal articles which focus on leadership and team dynamics in sport. For this annotated bibliography you will need to locate at least 5 relevant journal articles.   What does an annotated bibliography look like? The following in an example source from an annotated bibliography: Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 541-554. The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living

Subject Area: Psychology

Document Type: Capstone Project

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $10

Words 550

Pages 2

Completed in 8 days

Expert prowriter001

Client Review

Good job!

Positive
07.22.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Capstone Project

Annotated bibliographies

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Capstone Project

Summary of articles

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Capstone Project

Annotated bibliography

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Capstone Project

Tobacco Cessation Research

Subject of the project is Psychology   Type of the project is Capstone Project

Assessment 2

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5