Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Create a deductively valid argument for my position (Example)

Document Preview:

Delanta Brown Thursday Jul 6 at 6:46pm Manage Discussion Entry Premises 1. All social media is a form of communication. Premises 2. All human beings are social. _________________________________________________________________________________ Conclusion: Therefore human beings communicate through social media. The argument is valid because so many people use social media networks to Today 13(3) 10. Retrieved from http://www.socialworktoday.com (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Wagner A. Lori (2015). When your Smartphone Is Too Smart for Your Own Good: How Social Media Alters Human Relationships. The Journal of Individual Psychology Vol. 71 No. 2 the University of Texas Press. [...]

Order Description:

You must post to this discussion on at least four separate days of the week, and your posts must total at least 400 words as you address the questions. Your first post must be completed by Day 3 (Thursday) and the remainder of your posts must be completed by Day 7 (Monday). You must answer all aspects of the prompt at some point during the week. Also, reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can. Create a deductively valid argument for my position on "Does social media enhance or hinder interpersonal relationships?" (See Attached Week 1 Discussion for my argument). Prepare: To prepare to respond to this prompt, make sure to read carefully over the required portions of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4. View the deLaplante (2013) video What Is a Valid Argument? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as well as the other required media for the week. For more guidance about how to construct a valid argument for a controversial position,. Based on the sources, create a deductively valid argument for the position you defended in the Week One discussion. Reflect: To make your argument deductively valid, you will need to make sure that there is no possible way that your premises could be true and your conclusion false. Your premises must lead logically to the truth of your conclusion. Make sure that your argument is sound, that is in addition to being valid, make sure that the premises are true as far as you can tell. If your argument is invalid or if it has a false premise, revise it until you get an argument that you can stand behind. Write: Identify the components and structure of your argument by presenting your deductively valid argument in standard form, and explain how your conclusion follows from your premises. Guided Response: Read the arguments presented by your classmates, and analyze the reasoning that they have presented. In particular, if you believe that their argument is invalid, explain a way in which it would be possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. If you believe that their argument has a false premise, explain why a reasonable person might take it to be false. Finally, see if you can help them to improve their argument. How can they alter their premises so that all of them are true? What might they change in order to make their argument valid? So basically I need you so create a Deductively Valid Argument for my position on social media being a hindrance. Secondly I need you to respond to 3 peers that I have chosen, I am attaching there posts for you. All writing including responses will total min 400 words. Thanks!

Subject Area: Philosophy

Document Type: Paraphrasing

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $15

Words 275

Pages 1

Completed in 1 day

Expert Abigal

Client Review

I'm thoroughly pleased with Abigal and her professional writing and pleasant dialogue between us both. I will use here again shortly!

Positive
07.12.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Marx's State and Property

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Assignment 1

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

The Continental Difference

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Activity

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Question 2

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Machiavelli: What's New?

Subject of the project is Philosophy   Type of the project is Paraphrasing

Precise 6

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5