Get personal help with your studies from any of the 45,000 experienced experts on Studybay

  • No intermediaries
  • No plagiarism
  • Any Subject
  • Always on time

Here’s an example of project completed by our experts:

Case Brief "Separation of Powers" (Example)

Document Preview:

Center8500090881201000000Topic: Separation of Powers Name: Institution: Instructor: Date: Bush v. Schiavo 885 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2004) The Court that Decided the Case The case was decided by the Supreme Court of Florida. The matter arose in the state of California. The Supreme Court of Florida was the court with the competence and jurisdiction to interpret the laws that provide for separation of powers between the basic three arms of government; legislature executive and judiciary. American democracy is grounded on the doctrine of separation of powers and when a situation arises which creates a contention of who has the authority over which matter the issue touched on all arms of the government at the Florida county making the supreme court of Florida to be the competent jurisdiction to handle the case on appeal after it had been presided over by the High be exceptions. Importance of the Decision to Healthcare Administrators The case has a great significance in respect to administrators in healthcare. It enabled administrators to avoid liability in executing court orders when certain issues have been contested and decided by courts of competent jurisdiction. Administrators are able to easily come to a decision when in a limbo on which directives to follow in regards to the three arms of government. References Bush v. Schiavo 885 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2004). Keville T. D. & Eisenberg J. B. (2005). Bush v. Schiavo and the Separation of Powers: Why a State Legislature Cannot Empower a Governor to Order Medical Treatment When There is a Final Court Judgment that the Patient Would Not Want It. JL & Soc. Challenges 7 81. Robertson J. A. (2005). Schiavo and its (In) significance. Stetson L. Rev. 35 101. [...]

Order Description:

Case Brief "Separation of Powers"   1) Watch the following video on how to brief a case: www.youtube.com 2) Read the following articles on how to brief a case: www.lawnerds.com www.cengage.com 3)  Conduct research (ideally Google Scholar) to locate the following case listed below to find out more information in order to complete the required brief memo in step four. Week 5 Case "Separation of Powers" Brief: Separation of Powers:  Bush v Schiavo, 885 So. 2d 321 (2004) 4) Write the brief memo in your own words and include answers to the following in the order presented: The complete title and citation for the case. Explain which court decided this case. How did the case get to the court? Discuss the procedural history of the case. What legal issues were decided by the in this case? Discuss the facts of the case. What did the court decide? Give its holding (decision) and the reasons it gave for the decision (reasoning)? Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent? Why is this case important for healthcare administrators?

Subject Area: Law

Document Type: Model Answer / Exam Revision

This project has already been completed by one of the Studybay experts. The client rated this project:

Project's rating is 5/5

Price $10

Words 275

Pages 1

Completed in 1 day

Expert Ouma Hemstone

Client Review

well versed in law and very happy with this writer! Will assign all my law assignments to him in the future.

Positive
06.20.2017

Similar projects

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Model Answer / Exam Revision

Case Briefing Outline

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Model Answer / Exam Revision

International Trade Law

Subject of the project is Law   Type of the project is Model Answer / Exam Revision

Case Brief "Consent"

Need Help With a Project on This or Another Topic?

Cooperate with seasoned experts directly — create your project now and start getting help in 2 minutes.

Studybay top experts

Reviews from Studybay Community

  • Our Studybay rating is:
    4.9
  • Our ReviewCentre rating is:
    4.8
  • Our SiteJabber rating is:
    4.5