The Problem of Evil Essay

Document Type:Essay

Subject Area:Philosophy

Document 1

In understanding the problem of evil it requires a philosophical inquiry on the existence of God so as to establish a breakthrough that comes with demonstrating reasons behind the existence of God. Design Argument The universe is finely tuned to support life and as scientists argue, if certain features of the physical features of the universe were only slightly different, then the universe would not be able to support life. The design argument tries to explain the phenomenon that the ultimate structures of the physical universe support life-intelligent, conscious life and given any slight change in the most basic structure would alter the facts about fine-tuning (Layman 2006). In other words, slight changes in the most basic structures of the universe would destroy its capacity to support life.

Sign up to view the full document!

The scientist could not discover more basic structures that the most basic ones. Foremost, the fact that the actual structure of the world is simply a coincidence (Layman 2006). Secondly, is the physical necessity that explains that explains that the definitive physical structures can only be of a certain fashion, and that is the model that the universe takes. Third, there are some large proportions of the entire quantity of likely physical universes stands out as life-supporting making it possible for any actual universe to be life-supporting. The many universes hypotheses are the fourth rival explanation our life-supporting universe (Van Inwagen, 2008). Finally, Theism argues that universe supports life because life fulfills certain divine purposes. Naturalism adds theses to increase its explanatory power of their views, and it becomes increasingly complicated (Van Inwagen, 2008).

Sign up to view the full document!

The complication lowers the prior probability of Naturalism in a significant way. Therefore, we cannot claim that the explanation of evil by Naturalism make it superior to Theism explanation. In other words, the problem of evil does not give us a reason to accept Naturalism over Theism. Basic Naturalism does not lead us to expect conscious living things thus cannot lead us to expect any suffering/loss or natural evil. Theism explains the presence of evil, as well as Naturalism, do. Conclusion In conclusion, it is imperative to understand the different perspectives that explain why evil exists despite the theism belief that God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient. The debate looked into different alternatives that spoke to the reasons behind the design argument together with analysis on naturalist and theism views on the reasons behind evil if God exists.

Sign up to view the full document!

From $10 to earn access

Only on Studyloop

Original template

Downloadable