It's more Anthropology then Sociology, but it was the closest discipline, rather than Other. I have attached the Course outline which details the 2500 word essay on the 20th page, along with its criteria. I have also provided some of the articles which MUST be referenced. I believe there is a minimum of 10 references to be used in the essay, with 3 being references..
The head of your organization at International Building Materials pulls you aside and asks you to review a workplace dispute in the truss construction department. She has been informed that there is a dispute that could impact the company’s ability to meet overseas orders. The legal department is involved but your boss wants you to analyze the facts of the situation and report back to her so that she is informed as she develops subsequent market strategies. At the end of your meeting, she says, “Apply your critical thinking and analytical skills to figure out what happened, what we know and don’t know, and how the company might remedy this situation.” She wants your analysis at the end of the week. First, let’s consider what it means to engage in critical thinking. While the application of critical thinking may vary across disciplines, the steps are universal. Adapted from the writings of Bassham, Irwin, Nardone, and Wallace (2011), Lau (2011), and Lau and Chan (2015), critical thinking involves thinking clearly and systematically, and encompasses formulating ideas succinctly and precisely identifying the relevance and importance of ideas understanding the logical connections between ideas identifying, constructing, and evaluating arguments, claims, and evidence recognizing explicit and implicit assumptions, arguments, and biases detecting inconsistencies and common mistakes in reasoning formulating clear defensible ideas and conclusions evaluating the pros and cons of decisions reflecting on one’s own beliefs and values, and applying ethical decision making. Critical thinking is purposeful. The steps involved in critical thinking can be employed universally, in the analysis of all thoughts and actions, whether you are analyzing documents, ideas, assertions, or the quality of decisions/solutions. The process is not restricted to information gathering, nor is it about being "negative and fault-finding" (Bassham et al., 2011, p. 1). Lau and Chan write that "a critical thinker is able to deduce consequences from what he knows, and he knows how to make use of information to solve problems, and to seek relevant sources of information to inform himself" (2015, p. 2). While the process of critical thinking may involve exposing untruths and poor reasoning, it also involves engaging in cooperative reasoning to enable shared goals and decision making. We engage in the steps of critical thinking to learn deeply, to improve our ideas, to strengthen arguments and to "enhance work processes and improve social institutions" (Lau, 2011, p. 3). Critical thinking aligns with and informs ethical reasoning and decision making. Internet marketing expert Nick Melillo (2010) writes that “critical thinking plays a large role in ethics because it is the process by which we determine for ourselves whether or not something is right or wrong. In a sense, critical thinking is a form of analysis and determination of fact vs. fiction, identifying the unknown, and coming to an understanding (p. 1). When a person uses critical thinking, he develops the ability to evaluate actions and facts, which provides a basis to determine ethical standards. The process of critical thinking helps us weigh and verify information, assess intent, and consider consequences, thereby enabling more effective ethical decision making. Hereford (2015) suggests that critical thinking requires a particular mindset that includes being able to rely on reason instead of emotions assess a broad range of perspectives and viewpoints consider new evidence, explanations, findings, and alternative interpretations reassess information suspend personal prejudices and biases contemplate all reasonable possibilities, and avoid quick judgments. Now it is your turn to adopt a framework for critical thinking and purposefully engage in the practice as you respond to your boss’ tasking for a critical analysis of the ongoing dispute in the truss construction shop. Steps to Completion Step 1 Review the TGS Critical Thinking Rubric provided below. This rubric is intended to serve as a framework for critical thinking. Use it to structure your thinking for this assignment and for others in your studies at UMUC. The framework (rubric) is based on four key steps, each of which has several sub-steps, as shown in the attached. Identify and clearly explain the main issue or problem under critical consideration. Gather and analyze information to explore/investigate the issue or problem. Consider and analyze other possible viewpoints, conclusions, or decisions/solutions to the issue or problem Develop well-reasoned ideas, conclusions, and/or decisions/solutions, checking them against relevant criteria and benchmarks Step 2 Read the case "Trouble in the Truss Construction Shop". Deliverable Write a short paper (no more than 5 pages/1,250 words, excluding the cover page and references) that analyzes the claims in the case. Structure your paper with these major headings: Introduction Explanation of the issue or problem Analysis of the information Analysis of alternative viewpoints, conclusions, or solutions Personal or summarized conclusions and proposed decisions Conclusion Follow these guidelines: Use the TGS Critical Thinking Rubric to guide your analysis. Draw in references from at least one reputable outside resource related to the topic to support your conclusions or proposed decisions. Employ APA style for format and citation guidance. Include a cover sheet with your name and the Turnitin.com originality score. Remember: Even though I have suggested the major headings for your short paper, you should still follow best practices for structuring the paper. An effective introduction grabs the reader’s attention and sets the tone and direction for the rest of the paper. In reading an introduction, the reader should have a clear idea of what will follow. Supporting paragraphs move the reader from the general introduction to the more specific aspects of your analysis in the paper. The body paragraphs show how the information you are providing supports and relates to your thinking. Even though you've provided the title for each section, paragraphs across and within sections need to effectively transition from one to the next. Each paragraph should include a topic sentence, which contains the main point of the paragraph. The conclusion (#6) brings to a close what you have presented in your paper.You have moved the reader from the general introduction (“The intent of this paper is to critically analyze…) to the specific supporting paragraphs (the details under headings #2-5), and now to the conclusion, which briefly summarizes the issue or intent and restates the main points of your analysis (“detailed analysis of the issue of … resulted in conclusions that indicate… and suggest proposed decisions to…”).
The head of your organization at International Building Materials pulls you aside and asks you to review a workplace dispute in the truss construction department. She has been informed that there is a dispute that could impact the company’s ability to meet overseas orders. The legal department is involved but your boss wants you to analyze the facts of the situation and report back to her so that she is informed as she develops subsequent market strategies. At the end of your meeting, she says, “Apply your critical thinking and analytical skills to figure out what happened, what we know and don’t know, and how the company might remedy this situation.” She wants your analysis at the end of the week.