ASSIGNMENT ID
102006
SUBJECT AREA Literature
DOCUMENT TYPE Essay
CREATED ON 15th February 2017
COMPLETED ON 20th February 2017
PRICE
$30
18 OFFERS RECEIVED.
Expert hired: Jwillis

Critical Analysis

Your purpose in these papers is to analyze the rhetorical situation and purpose of assigned literary works. Going back to the description of the course—who made it? when and where (occasion)? for whom (audience)? for what purpose(s)? with what degree of success? How do you know? How do the answers to these questions affect what the author could say, and how (ie: style, genre)? How does the meaning of the text differ or change from its original rhetorical situation to our own? Why? Why do you think this is interesting or important (the answer to which is the basis for a thesis statement). A successful paper will be developed in the form of an essay of 4-5 pages, with a clear thesis, and thorough, detailed analysis. You’ll use 3 or more good secondary sources, cited correctly. You will demonstrate a very solid command of grammar, spelling, etc. To make this work more manageable, I encourage you to work in teams of 2-4: help one another find and evaluate sources. You may write the papers together too. Please make use of me as much as you need—ask questions in class and see me in office hours to discuss topics and research strategies. If you choose to work in a team, each assignment you submit must include a self-assessment for each member: what did YOU contribute to the project? For each paper: 1. For every main and supporting claim you make about a work, you must have evidence. The most important evidence comes from close textual and rhetorical analysis of the works in question, so a vital part of writing each of these papers is reading and re-reading your primary sources—the stories, plays, or poems that you’re interested in. You should KNOW what every single word in the text means. LOOK STUFF UP. You cannot write a strong analysis based on incomplete reading. Seriously: don’t hand anything in until you understand what you’ve read. In order to answer these questions, you’ll need to do research, to find evidence from good sources. You will need to consider the historical and social context of a work as well as details about the author’s life and beliefs (religious, philosophical, idiosyncratic); you will definitely want to find out what your learned colleagues have already been saying about each work’s meaning and significance. Finding these kinds of secondary sources takes work, and time—overestimate how much time you’ll need. Be prepared to get creative and exert yourselves. Using a basic web search will NOT be enough, guaranteed. The MCPHS University library has a lot of good resources in databases and the e-brary. If you find sources using Google Scholar (not regular Google) the library can usually get those materials to you fairly quickly, though not automatically, through ILL. The BPL has better databases in literature and history, such as the MLA, JStor, and Project Muse. If you’re willing to challenge yourselves a bit (and leave the building) you can find everything you need. Note: You must be able to tell the difference between articles and journals/magazines; chapters and books; webpages and websites; sources and the databases/search engines where you find the databases. You can neither cite nor evaluate your sources correctly otherwise. Writer’s Help is a great tool for reviewing the principles of citation and details about format. Use it! 2. You should be able to paraphrase/quote from/refer to specific passages in both the primary and secondary sources. DON'T quote long passages--only quote enough to support or demonstrate the point you're making. DON'T quote something and then say "this shows that...": 1) Make your point, 2) quote/paraphrase, then explain how (1) and (2) relate to one another and to your thesis. 3. Cite everything. Include a list of Works Cited including your primary and secondary sources; aim for at least one secondary source for each primary source (more are better!). If you use Wikipedia or Sparknotes etc, do so only to get started on your research. They do not count toward your total secondary sources BUT if you get any information or ideas from them that you use in your paper, you must cite them as sources.
This project has already been completed on Studybay
On Studybay you can order your academic assignment from one of our 45000 project experts. Hire your expert directly, without overpaying for agencies and affiliates!
Check the price for your project

See other similar orders

Studybay assignment progress timeline

Studybay is a freelance platform where you can order a Critical Analysis paper, written from scratch by professors and tutors.
15 February 2017
User created a project for Literature
15 February 2017
18 experts responded
15 February 2017
User contacted expert Jwillis
15 February 2017
User hired expert Jwillis who offered a price of $30 for the project and has experience doing similar projects
20 February 2017
The expert completed the project Critical Analysis for 5 days, meeting the deadline
20 February 2017
User accepted the project right away and completed the payment
20 February 2017
User left a positive review

Other projects in this subject area

Random blog posts

The strengths and weaknesses of labelling theory
Labelling theory and its theorists focus on the groupings and/or those who were considered to be legal and labelled thus by society. Labelling theorists examined the various interactions between your 'legal' groups and people and the conformist population. Labeling theory was very popular in the 1960s and early 1970s, but then fell into decline-partly as a result of the merged results of empirical research. This article will go on showing the roots of labelling theory, the idea itself and can show its strengths and weaknesses using various case-studies and good examples. Tannenbaum (1938) is widely regarded as the first labelling theorist. His main concept was the 'dramatization of evil'. He stated that if one is described as being a unlawful then he automatically becomes one. Erwin Lamert (1951) founded the "societal Reaction" theory.