It is clear that all we want to live as much longer as we can. But how to be when there is the existence of lots of hazards and other dangerous things? In addition, from the beginning of the life people had the innate desire to survive in any environment in spite of conditions from the earliest civilizations. Those persons who made a choice for fighting with the henchmen of death, war and famine, developed more serious and perfect agricultural techniques and created more complex social structures. The primal instinct for existing drove the people to proliferate across the world, as lots of populations boomed without the bound. According to the history, the predominant masses shared the fervent yearning for the life, but the every person on the earth was befallen by the inevitable. The acceptance of the natural process of life became the standard when the multitudes and the elixir of life failed eventually. As for religion, its zeal relieved the hopelessness of the situation for the citizens of Rome, dreamed of the Elysian Fields. The Buddhists awaited the bliss of Nirvana and the Christians in full measure prayed for the majestic Heaven. In spite of the fact whether it was the spiritual continuance in the afterlife, the scientific perpetuation of the physical self or the philosophical justification of the fundamental essence, it brings the meaning to the humans’ lives in the relation to the individuals.
The depth of this the most important argument is considered to be the most irrelevant and ambiguous to every individual who is unique, of course. Firstly, these cases of immorality stated above, but at the same time all of them equally valid. They are not inclusive in accordance with the every possible situation. It is even better than the immorality will be defined as the eternal perpetuation of the every component of the human, which may relate to the personal identity. The second point is that when the meaning of life is something special for every one of us, the meaning can one be pertinent to the individuals. It means that the person can perceive this meaning as the something what is relevant. Of course, it happens that if the person dies, and it happens without the everlasting retention of the components of them, the meaning of the life would be lost for them forever. Later, this context of the similar statement is constrained to some effects of the immorality on the individual alone, and this is not said about the family or friends.
It is clear that all we want to live as much longer as we can. But how to be when there is the existence of lots of hazards and other dangerous things? In addition, from the beginning of the life people had the innate desire to survive in any environment in spite of conditions from the earliest civilizations.