These days, there are some famous and well-known US cases when it comes to attacking search warrants. People should know that the 4th amendment of the US Constitution states the rights of people to be safe and secure in their documents, houses, persons, and effects against all kinds of unreasonable seizures and searches, and these rights can’t be violated. Besides, no warrants can be issued to search a particular place and seize people or their belongings without a probable cause.
For example, when criminal defense lawyers attack search warrants and courts determine that they need to be thrown out, the evidence collected by police officers must be thrown out of the court too. After that, cases against defendants can be dismissed because of the lack of important evidence. When lawyers in courts fight over if specific evidence can be thrown out because police officers violated the rights of defendants in some way, they need to understand the most important cases in this legal field.
To well understand relevant issues in a specific situation, people should know what happened in a given case and what finding courts made. Only after that, lawyers can argue their cases by taking the facts of big cases and comparing them to their current cases to convince courts that they are quite similar to make the same ruling. Nowadays, there are only a few major cases that can be used for such a comparison, including Franks versus Delaware in 1978.
In this famous case, Franks was convicted of raping because his accusers described his race, age, hair, face, body, and other important traits while giving a detailed description of his outfit. The victim also stated that her attacker wore specific clothes, including black pants. Police officers questioned Franks’ coworkers who stated that the defendant had this type of clothing, and they used this testimony as their powerful evidence.
In conclusion, the 4th amendment protects all people from unreasonable seizures and searches, and this means that all search warrants need to specify the crimes to which the evidence is related. If there are no probable and legal causes or connections between the things that are seized and crimes under their investigation, warrants are considered overbroad. The same rule is applied even if warrants establish probable causes to suspect that a given person committed a particular crime.
These days, there are some famous and well-known US cases when it comes to attacking search warrants. People should know that the 4th amendment of the US Constitution states the rights of people to be safe and secure in their documents, houses, persons, and effects against all kinds of unreasonable seizures and searches, and these rights can’t be violated.