Get help with any kind of project - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
I. Background The three leading Detroit-based manufacturers in the American automotive sector, General Motors, Chrysler and Ford, are jointly known as the Big Three for distinguishing their surgeries from those of rivals in terms of size, earnings, geography and profits. In early 2009, the Big Three saw themselves covered in debts and losses since the U.S. Government given them an initial bailout package worth $25 billion to rescue them from bankruptcy (Isidore). Through an investigation of the ethics behind government bailouts along with also an investigation of arguments for and against the decision to give out this type of bundle to the auto companies, I will argue in this paper that, provided the situation in which the choice had to be hastily created, it was morally warranted for the U.S. government to benefit the bailout package to the Big Three. These circumstances, however, could have been avoided had the automobile sector not dismissed the outcomes of its prolonged disturbance in corporate malpractices. Therefore, if no lesson is learnt by this downturn and such neglect continues, the Big Three, or any other company for that matter, should not be allowed access to these huge amounts of public capital in the future. Starting 2001, as oil prices started to grow, profit corners of the Detroit automakers began to sink; a tendency that has been only worsened by the financial meltdown of 2007. Despite substantially decreasing their workforces and closing operating units nationally, the automakers were not able to lower prices enough to guarantee gains in the falling market. In fall 2008, because the continuing recession devised and automotive sales dropped, the Big Three - year old with large legacy costs вЂ" speedily burnt during their once plentiful cash reserves. I.. .