Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Tribune against Measure Q The Tribune published an editorial stating their opposition to Measure Q on Saturday, 16th october, 2004. It describes the debate over the measure “boiling right down to one sentence: ‘It will be unlawful for just about any person or entity to propagate, cultivate, raise, or grow designed organisms in San Luis Obispo County genetically.” The Tribune claims that “Measure Q is a poorly written ordinance with unintended consequences of banning research on life-saving medicines.” It starts with a highly effective technique of stating arguments of the proponents and giving an answer to each, but proceeds with an unconvincing set of factors to vote against Measure Q and a summary that weakly ties this article together. To open up the editorial, the writer queries proponent’s credibility. “Proponents state the ban would provide county farmers safety from GE crops until all dangers are known,” is definitely argued by the declaration, “The farming community more often than not says that the ban will harm them competitively if or if they choose GE seeds.” The supporters of Measure Q are questioned concerning where they are receiving their details if the people they are “protecting” experience the ordinance will harm them. That is a successful technique to persuade the reader that advocates of the ordinance are untrustworthy. This article supports its declare that Measure Q is certainly a badly created ordinance by discussing the use of the wide term “organism” in the measure. It offers arguments from two credible resources, San Luis Obispo lawyer Robin Baggett and the Washington D.C lawyer of Arent Fox. Both agree that the use of the term “organism” implies both laboratory analysis and also crops, therefore both will be banned. Baggett, a l...