Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Arrogance in Oedipus and Cocteau's Infernal Machine The misconception of Oedipus times back again hundreds of years. Overtime a misconception shifts in many methods as each orator or writer presents their personal edition. The main plot remains intact, but authors add their own style to the tragic story. In the case of Sophocles' Oedipus the California king and Jean Cocteau's Infernal Machine both writers concentrate on the pompous character of Oedipus. Since this quality eventually has destructive powers, the interactions Oedipus provides with various other people shows this arrogance. Although, the two writers show Oedipus in various methods to focus on their different designs both make use of the romantic relationship between Oedipus and Teiresias to show Oedipus' conceited character. In both has, this arrogance manifests in Oedipus' rejection of the prophet Teiresias. Nevertheless, the two playwrights vary in the romantic relationship between these two character types significantly. Cocteau's Oedipus immediately disrespects Teiresias' prophecy. This rejection of the prediction and alerts of Teiresias stresses his theme of malicious gods. Equivalently, in Sophocles' version of the myth, the denial of Teiresias demonstrates the primary theme of the destructive nature of arrogance. Rather of the gods keeping him back again, Oedipus' personal satisfaction will not really enable him to believe Teiresias. Oedipus thinks that he is definitely above everyone and everything. As in Cocteau just, he feels that he can escape the gods and overlook destiny also. In Sophocles version of the myth, the denial of Teiresias immediately does not occur right. At first, Oedipus regards the prophet Teiresias in the proper, respectful manner. Oedipus greets him by exclaiming, "My lord, in you alone we look for a champion, in you by itself one which can rescu...