Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Considering that the U.S. Congress passed the No Child Left Behind program, standardized testing is now the norm for American colleges. Under this method, each child attending a school is required to take a standardized test at specific grade points to assess their level of comprehension. Parents, scholars and all stakeholders involved take part in continuous discussions over its effectiveness in assessing students' comprehension, teachers' competency and the effects of the test on the education system. Though these tests were set in place to create equality, experts note that they've created more inequality in the classroom. In efforts to research this issue further, this informative article reviews two articles about how standardized testing. This essay reviews the sentiments of the authors and their insight into standardized evaluation. The posts give adequate evidence to show that standardized tests are not effective at quantifying a teacher's competency because they do not take into account the school environment and its effect on the pupils. In "Standardized testing simplifies teaching," the author, Diane Ravitch, analyzed a book she authored, The death and life of the wonderful American school system: how analyzing and choice are undermining education. This review highlights various cons of Standardized testing on the students and educators. She says that standardized testing and using incentives to inspire students and educators have failed to meet up with the set objectives. Even though the author was in the forefront of advocating for this particular system, she is now opposed to it and sceptical of the use of incentives to motivate teachers. She reviews the role of charter schools in perpetuating classism. She states that standard tests and the use of...