Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Without considering the individual component, the implementation of health information technology in the medical system will fail. Health information technology (HIT), a tool to reach the best use of information. Informatics, the big picture, helps individuals using information to perform cognitive tasks better with technologies. (Hersh, 2009) Currently, implementation jobs as a matter of routine will focus mainly on the technology. This review will examine two articles one from the United States, the other from the United Kingdom describing different methods for considering the human element. The practice of sensemaking used from the U.S article and the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) employed from the U.K. article increases the understanding of how people can help determine the success or failure of an implementation project. Currently, global efforts exist to integrate HIT into healthcare systems. Efforts at the U.K. are plagued with various levels of success, projects delayed and over budget and individual care at times experienced harmful consequences (Murray, et al., 2011). The U.S. is suffering similar consequences which Kitzmiller attributes to the lack of studies available concerning how to contend with HIT implementation projects. The lack of available studies contributed to the slow inconsistent adoption of HIT by hospitals. This has created a void in the understanding of how create and handle HIT implementation project teams (Kitzmiller, Anderson, & McDaniel, Jr., 2010). From the U.K. they have a massive number of data on successful implementations, but have little regard for the early studies due to the dearth of evidence supporting general improvement. In the circumstance of a hospital HIT implementation, the implementers should consist...