Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
Cloning Could Save Species from going Extinct It's been stated by many scientists, particularly those in the region of Japan, who believe that cloning could be used to save species from extinction by cloning the expiring members of this breed that is going extinct. Nevertheless, this would pose several issues instantly. The most apparent is that cloning is indeed a long way off (although our extinction is allegedly farther in time). Although no one knows when cloning will develop to a full-fledged victory, most scientists believe it is at least fifty decades off. That is really not that far off, but again, it's a minimum estimate based on very little material. The second is argued by ethicists when they say that cloning the expiring members of a breed restricts cultural and cell diversity. These select survivors would produce a whole new inhabitants... however, the new population will be based solely upon their genetic code. This, in turn, would limit further [natural] offspring, and, consequently, the species, once fully restored, would have extremely limited genetic code in comparison to the wide array of it they had before their brush with oblivion. This ties in with the third reason, which ethicists also assert about; if it's morally and scientifically just to prolong a dying species through artificial implications. Generally speaking, this disagreement pertains to not all of the creatures of Earth, but only us. Humans. Typical. Ethicists say that when we start to die out, it would function as cause of pure evolution, and they state that it would be "wrong in every sense conceivable" to prolong our presence by cloning dying individuals and restoring the population. Additionally they revert to their prior arguement of restricting cultural and ce...