Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Paradox of Revenge in Edgar Allan Poe's The Cask of Amontillado ? The Cask of Amontillado? Raises a question of interest to the various character of itself (Davidson 202); How Can stability of a person's self be restored after primal impulses are acted upon? This question proposes the fantasy of offense without consequence (Stepp 60). Edgar Allan Poe uses first person point of view, vivid symbolism and situational irony to show that due to man's inner self, revenge is ultimately not possible. Edward Davidson indicates that Montresor, the most important character of the story, "has the capacity of going downward from his thoughts or intellectual being and to his brute or bodily self and then return again to his intellectual being with his entire ego being unimpaired" (202). However, Poe tells that story from Montresor?s point of perspective. The usage of first person narration provides the reader with insight to Montresor's inner struggles. The first person narration is Poe's way of ensuring that the reader knows that Montresor isn't effective at this stability. The ideas and feelings of Montresor lead the reader to conclude that he is not successful at revenge. Montresor states in telling his own story, "You, who so well know the essence of my soul, won't suppose, but that I gave utterance to a threat" (153). By communicating in this manner, the question arises of who Montresor is really speaking to, and why he is telling this tale fifty years later. An individual can only conclude that it is for one of 2 reasons: he's either bragging or ultimately giving confession. Since he tells the story, it becomes obvious that he has not yet fulfilled his desire to acquire, and currently a half of a century laterhe's still fighting his conscience. Since Gregory Jay s.. .