Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
In the early first century AD, the Roman Empire was subject to autocratic rule along with the old Republic was long dead. Augustus was ruling for two decades and most of that time he was adored and praised from the Senate and the people of Rome. During his reign, the Augustus had the sole lingering problem of finding a successor to take over the use of Emperor. He had picked 3 unique heirs in his time of rulenonetheless, they all passed before they had the chance to inherit Augustus' prestigious power. His fourth choice, Tiberius, was the one to succeed Augustus. He was often referred to, by Augustus, as a general overall and the only one capable of protecting Rome from her enemies. The statement, 'Tiberius is condemned by several ancient historians (such as Tacitus), and his reign is frequently portrayed as being harmful to the welfare of the Roman Empire' is invalid as he treated the senate rather, created powerful economics and security in the nation and fostered the empire into an unprecedented condition of prosperity. This hypothesis will be shown by means of this essay by analyzing factors such as Tiberius' administration of the Empire, his relationship with the senate, his fiscal control, the impact of Sejanus over his rule and why were his final years as Emperor called a 'reign of terror' by Tacitus. At an early age, Tiberius had been given military command and also in his very first effort he won great renown with his troops along with the Senate. He followed this up with another victory in Pannonia and because of his efforts he obtained a triumph in Rome, the single greatest honor any overall could receive. Augustus allowed him the powers of a Tribune. Tiberius cared greatly for the welfare of the troops and they reacted with respect and profound.