Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
A Comparison of London by William Blake, and Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802 by William Wordsworth The two "London" by William Blake, and also "Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, September 3, 1802" by William Wordsworth are written about London, and had been composed within ten decades of each other, but both possess contrasting viewpoints of what it is that they believe London is like. They express their own thoughts by employing different poem techniques and styles. Both of them are very powerful and create vivid images in the reader's head. "London" has a powerful rhythm, which highlights the last word of every line. This accent impacts the manner in which the poem will be read, and anxieties about the words with the most importance, for example "weakness" and "woe". This helps the reader understand the screenplay and aids create images in their minds. The rhyme scheme of ABAB etc. can also be easy, and highlights how everything is commanded, or quantified. Back in "London" what's said to be commanded or "chartered", that can be revealed to be wrong. It is said that the most natural thing in London, the Thames, is also chartered. It also portrays an image of poverty, and as that which is owned by the cities institutions, and borrowed from the folks of town. Even the repletion of "chartered" emphasizes how unnatural it's. It is also proven that each individual in London is miserable, or is suffering. He states that in "each face" he matches he sees "marks of weakness, marks of woe." This makes the reader feel that it is a simple thing to note, also London has in some way changed the way in which individuals look. That can be used to demonstrate how awful London is that it may actually influence individuals in that.