Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
The Original Position thought experiment devised by John Rawls, requires you to argue for a client behind a veil of ignorance. Not knowing anything about the advantageous or disadvantageous position of said customer within society, one must resolve the problem presented in a way that does not dismiss the interests of any member of society. The Original Position invokes the social contract in which all members of society are seen as rational agents who agree to principles out of a self-interested stance. It concedes that rational agents will agree that something is appropriate if and only if it's viewed as treating them as equal participants within that self-regarding choice. It takes an egalitarian way of moral dilemmas in that all members of the society have been agreeing people with an equal right to fundamental liberties. Those from the Original Position must use all of natural facts known to them in order to make their decision, and must also worry about those likely to be manipulated by such a decisionвЂ"the safest wager being one that prevents the worst potential situation. There is also no conception of the Great or of any moral hierarchy. In this manner, the Original Position functions as a sort of fast-track test in assessing the validity of universalized maxims or laws by hypothetically implementing them to an idealized, egalitarian model of earth. In employing the Original Position to the contentious problem of abortion this might indicate that my gender neutral client would be operating in a world devoid of sex oppression. Even though a universe of free, and equal men and women would presumably not partake in objectifying acts and therefore not produce unwanted offspring there are still natural facts that require the abortion process in secur...