Get help with any kind of assignment - from a high school essay to a PhD dissertation
1) Presupposition of Atheism In my own opening argument, I would like to prove that atheism/non-belief can be justified. That is through an argument referred to as the presupposition of atheism. Atheism/Agnosticism is properly justified through the known fact that the existence of God is an extraordinary claim, hence in the lack of extraordinary evidence the word that God exists could be regarded as fake. 1.If a state is extraordinary, in the lack of extraordinarily strong proof in its favor after that, the claim could be considered false. 2.The declare that God exists can be an extraordinary claim. 3.Consequently, in the lack of strong proof in its favor extraordinarily, the declare that a god exists could be considered false. 4.There is normally no extraordinarily strong proof in its favor. 5.Therefore, the declare that god exists could be considered false. This argument is generally known as вЂњExtraordinary claims means amazing evidence.вЂќ To clear everything up, I am going to define an вЂњextraordinary claimвЂќ as the next: Extraordinary claim: A declare that contradicts the accepted physical laws or our good sense, everyday encounters in the world. Fact: Extraordinary claims vary within their degree of extraordinariness. For instance, let me provide three statements: 1.I ate a PB&J for lunch time. 2.I gained $1,000,000 in the lottery. 3.I rode a unicorn through the forest yesterday evening and noticed the tooth fairy. Statement 1 may be the least remarkable of the three. It could not really contradict the statutory laws and regulations of common sense, nor would it not contradict our physical encounters. Therefore, little evidence is necessary for a (rational) person to trust the statement. Statement 2 is even more extraordinary because a lot of people do not win the lotto. This claim our contradicts.